Blackwood's Edinburgh magazine, Vol. 71, No. 439, May, 1852Various
History
Blackwood's Edinburgh magazine, Vol. 71, No. 439, May, 1852
Various
England -- Periodicals; Scotland -- Periodicals
If the main body of the Whigs are prepared to follow Lord John Russell
wherever he may go, notwithstanding all that has passed, and all that he
has indicated for the future, we, of course, can have no manner of
objection. But let them distinctly understand what is in store for them
if they choose to adopt such a course. Many of them, we know, were
thoroughly disgusted with the Reform Bill which he introduced this
Session; and did not hesitate to express their conviction that it was an
unnecessary, dangerous, and reprehensible measure. If Lord John Russell
returns to power, he must bring in a new Reform Bill far more democratic
than the last. That is the condition on which he is allowed to retain
the nominal leadership of the Opposition, and from it he cannot depart.
The Manchester party will not rest until they have attained their end.
They are for no half-measures; they are plagued by no scruples. Their
doctrine is, that political power should be vested in the uneducated
masses,—“the instinct of the million being,” according to their great
oracle, “wiser than the wisdom of the wisest.” In other words, mob rule
is to be paramount, and whatever the majority wish to be done, must be
straightway put into execution. Is there any reflecting man in the
country who does not shudder at the thought of such a consummation?—is
there any one conversant with history who does not see to what it must
necessarily lead? With no lack of demagogues to mislead and excite them,
what part of the British fabric would be secure against the attacks of
an ignorant democracy? It may be true that Lord John Russell does not
contemplate this—that he would even shrink from and repudiate the
thought with horror. But he is not the less doing all in his power to
forward the advance of anarchy. By consenting to lower the suffrage, he
has given authority and significance to demands far more comprehensive
in their scope. He has indicated that the bulwark which he himself
erected, twenty years ago, is not to be considered as permanent, but
merely temporary in its purpose. He has begun, like the foolish
dikebuilder of Holland, to tamper with the seawall of his own
construction, heedless of the inundation which must follow.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account