Blackwood's Edinburgh magazine, Vol. 71, No. 439, May, 1852Various
History
Blackwood's Edinburgh magazine, Vol. 71, No. 439, May, 1852
Various
England -- Periodicals; Scotland -- Periodicals
Still, though the national pride was deeply hurt by the measure, the
graver judgment of the nation acquiesced in the extinction of the
Legislature. This was the fruit of those concessions which had been made
by the ignorance of Government, and demanded by the intrigues of the
Opposition. From the period of lowering the franchise to the Roman
Catholic forty-shilling freeholder, the votes of the Romish peasantry
became to the Government a terror, to the Opposition a snare, and to
both, the sources of a new policy. In a few sessions more, the
Parliament must have become almost totally _Papist_. Thus, after much
declamation in the clubs, and much murmuring in the streets—after
threats of declaring the mover of the measure “an enemy to his
country”—and after a duel between the celebrated Grattan, the head of
the Opposition, and Corry, the Chancellor of the Irish Exchequer, the
diadem was taken off the head of Ireland, and quietly lodged in
Whitehall. England thenceforth became the field of Irish ambition, and
the mart of Irish ability.
Moore came to London apparently for the purpose of commencing his
studies as a barrister. Whether his volatile and fanciful spirit would
have relished the details of a profession demanding so much labour in
its rudiments, and so much perseverance in its pursuit, is now not worth
a question, for he probably never opened a book of law; but he had
brought with him a book of a more congenial kind; a translation of
_Anacreon_, to be published by subscription, and dedicated “by
permission” to the Prince of Wales, (George IV.,)—an honour obtained,
like all his early popularity, through his musical accomplishments.
Moore was not a scholar, in the sense of a Markland or a Bentley; but he
had the best part of scholarship, the spirit of his author. The elegance
of this versification of the old Greek lover of “smiles and wine” was
universally acknowledged. All former translations of _Anacreon_ were
poor and pedantic, to the richness and grace of the volume then offered
to the public eye.
Whether the original was the work of Ionia or Athens; whether one-half
of the Odes were not _imitations_ in later Greek, with Gregory Nazianzen
and a dozen others for their authors; whether Polycrates or Hipparchus
was their patron—in short, the questions which still perplex Oxford, and
break the rest of Cambridge—which drive both into the logomachies of
Teutonic criticism, and waste English pens and patience on the imported
drudgeries of the Leipsic press—were matters which gave the translator
but slight trouble. Nature had created him for the translation—the
praises of wine and beauty, of flowers and sunshine, were a language of
his own; they formed his style through the greater part of his life; and
Cupid and Bacchus never had a laureate more devoted, and more
successful.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account