To the industrial classes, whether in the produce of land, mines, or
manufactures, it need hardly be said that this gradual rise of prices
will be the greatest of all possible blessings. They may easily
prognosticate what these will be: experience has given them a clear mode
of estimating them. They have only to figure to themselves the _very
reverse_ of the whole seasons of distress which they have experienced
during the last thirty-five years, to foresee their destiny. We shall
not say that their condition will resemble what it was during the
periods of excitement of 1824, 1836, or 1845; because these were
artificial periods, when the effects of our monetary laws acted as
ruinously in fostering speculation, as they did in the years immediately
following in contracting the currency by which it was to be carried on.
The change, in this instance, like all those induced by the wisdom of
Nature, not occasioned by the folly or precipitation of man, will be
gradual in its operation. The rise of prices will be so slow that it
will from year to year be scarcely perceptible. From ten years, however,
to ten years, it will be very conspicuous, and produce most important
effects upon the progress of society. It will be gradual, but ceaseless,
and unaccompanied by any of those vacillations which, under our monetary
laws for the last thirty years, have produced such frightful
devastation.
Nor need the consuming classes be under any apprehension that this rise
of prices, which it is altogether beyond their power to prevent, will in
the end prove detrimental to their interests. But for the delusions
which, for their own purposes, the Free-Trade party have diffused
through the world, it would have been superfluous, and in truth
ridiculous, to have said anything on this subject. Every consumer stands
on some producer: _ex nihilo nihil fit_. Is any argument required to
show that the former cannot be in the long run injured by the bettering
of the condition of the latter, by whose industry he is maintained? It
is as clear as any proposition in geometry, that if the producing
classes are kept in a prosperous condition, there must every year be an
addition made to the sum total of the produce, which is divided among,
and maintains the _fainéants_ consumers. Those who depend upon fixed
money-payments, indeed—as fundholders, annuitants, bondholders, and the
like—will, in the first instance, undoubtedly be placed in a worse
condition, because the money they receive will not go so far in the
purchase of commodities as it once did. But this evil will even to them
be in a degree compensated by the superior steadiness in money
transactions, which a plentiful circulating medium never fails to
induce, and the absence of those periodical monetary crises, the result
of faulty legislation, which have so often in the last thirty years
swallowed up the investments deemed the most secure.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account