The figures are given from memory, but they are in round numbers
correct. Now we do say, that here is a decisive proof of a destruction
of property which would be unexampled in history if the simultaneous
ruin of the West Indies may not be considered as a parallel instance.
Here is property, which must have been worth, when the debt was
contracted, at least £30,000,000 (for £2,000,000 is a very small margin
to leave for so huge a mass of debt) sold for less than £6,000,000,
being A FIFTH PART OF ITS FORMER VALUE. The prices which the land
fetched, the commissioners tell us, varied from _four to fourteen years’
purchase_, the average being ten years. We question if the history of
the world prior to 1846 will afford a parallel instance of ruin of
property by pacific legislative measures. It is in vain to ascribe this
to the Irish famine: that was over six years ago. Equally vain is it to
ascribe it to the savage and lawless character of the Irish peasantry.
They were as lawless when creditors advanced £28,000,000 on these
estates as they are now, and far more formidable, because not weakened
by the loss of 2,000,000 of their numbers; and if changed at all, it
should have been for the better, because they have, for the last
twenty-two years, been under the government of the Liberals and
Free-Traders, such decided friends in principle and practice to the
interests of labour, and the welfare of the poor. The frightful decline
in value can be ascribed to one cause, and only one—_Free Trade in
grain_—which has laid waste the Emerald Isle as completely in many
places as _Free Trade in sugar_ has devastated the West Indies.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account