To the naturalist, the most puzzling of all questions is to define
accurately the limits between instinct and reason, as the terms are
commonly understood. We have long ago given up the attempt in absolute
despair. Take, for example, the case of the rooks. They can distinguish
Sunday from the rest of the week as accurately as any precentor, and are
perfectly aware that, on that day, no gun will be levelled at them. You
may make demonstrations with a stick if you please, but the rooks will
not fly away. They merely retort with a caw of utter scorn. But on
Monday morning the Lord of Rookwood is a changed being. He will not on
any account let you within a hundred yards of him; and so excessively
acute is he, that you would almost swear he scents the powder in your
pocket. So is it with the roes. When wandering unarmed through a
Highland wood, you are almost certain to fall in with several of these
beautiful creatures, who regard you almost without alarm, and glide
slowly into the shaw. They know quite well that you are not there with
any murderous design, and they neither fear nor avoid you. Not so if you
carry a gun. In that case, you may look long enough about you before you
will descry the white spot, which is the distinguishing mark of the
roe-deer. They whom you seek are lying close in the brackens, perhaps
but a very few yards from you, but they will not stir till you are gone.
Beating for roe is stupid work. We do not see the fun of standing for
half the day in a pass waiting for a chance shot, with no other
regalement for the ear than the hoarse braying of the beaters, and their
everlasting shouts of “Shoo!” A much better method is that of stirring
the roe with a foxhound, when he glides from thicket to thicket, in
advance of his pursuer, whose clear note indicates his approach, and
gives you sufficient warning. But enough on this head.
We have already, in former articles, while reviewing the works of Mr St
John and the Stuarts, had occasion to enter pretty fully into the
subject of deer-stalking. Therefore we shall not again go over that
ground, although tempted to do so by Mr Colquhoun’s admirable chapter
devoted to that noble sport, in which he lays down, with great
perspicuity, all the rules which ought to be observed by the stalker. To
such of our readers as aspire to have their exploits chronicled in the
columns of the _Inverness Courier_, (the best sporting register in
Scotland,) we recommend Mr Colquhoun’s book, advising them to study it
well before they venture forth into the mountains. It is true that no
theory can supply the lack of practice; still, deer-stalking is
eminently an art; and there are distinct rules for following it, which
must not be disregarded. Mr Colquhoun is more concise than any former
writer, and we prefer him, as a guide, to Mr Scrope.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account