Turn we now to Tiverton, where, on the ensuing day, (Wednesday the 7th
July,) a very distinguished person was re-elected for Parliament—we mean
LORD PALMERSTON. The noble lord declared his political opinions in
considerable detail; and no one can read what fell from him without
admiring the fascinating ease and playfulness which adorned the
manifestation of intellectual power and great political knowledge. _Not
one syllable_ was uttered by Lord Palmerston of a hostile, disparaging,
or offensive character, with reference to Lord Derby or his Government.
He did not stoop to borrow those vulgar and degrading terms of
opprobrium in which so many of his co-aspirants for political power
suffered themselves to indulge, thereby disentitling themselves to the
consideration of gentlemen. He undoubtedly spoke of Protection as “a
question long since settled,” admitting that he himself had been in
favour of such “a small duty as would not have raised in any perceptible
degree the price of food, but which would never be again submitted to
the choice of the agriculturists.” He deprecated hasty reforms,
earnestly advocating “steady progressive improvement of our
institutions, going slowly and deliberately about them,” and deprecating
“rashly and hastily overturning those ancient institutions under which
this country has long flourished and prospered.” He utterly repudiated
vote by ballot and triennial Parliaments, justified his support of the
ministerial Militia Bill, and spoke with extreme caution on the subject
of the Maynooth grant. He made no allusion to any political leaders, nor
indicated any possible situation or combination of parties in the new
Parliament, nor what was the course which he himself might feel bound or
disposed to pursue. Thus much for this eminent person, who said nothing
which might not also have been said by any even _decided_ supporter of
the Ministry. The indignity which had been inflicted upon himself by
Lord Derby’s predecessor, he passed over in dignified silence. Lord
Palmerston, again, is claimed by the Liberal journals as an undoubted
opponent of the Ministry, whatever measures they may or may not propose!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account