Blackwood's Edinburgh magazine, Vol. 75, No. 462, April 1854Various
History
Blackwood's Edinburgh magazine, Vol. 75, No. 462, April 1854
Various
England -- Periodicals; Scotland -- Periodicals
multiplicity of the relations and the alliances of the Sublime Porte and
of the European States, giving to it, in every respect, the right and
the faculty of participating in the community which binds these States
to each other, and to the security which they derive from them, the
necessity will be felt of confirming and completing in that sense the
Treaty of 1841, and for that it reposes on the friendly efforts of the
allied Courts.” And the allied Courts, in turn, declared, “that the
Russian Government, which invaded the territory of the Sultan, had
placed itself in opposition with the resolutions declared by the great
powers of Europe in 1840 and 1841. That, moreover, the spirit of the
important transaction in which Russia took part in 1841 with the other
powers, and with Turkey herself, is opposed to the pretension that the
affairs of the East should be treated otherwise than in common, and in
the conferences in which all these interests should be examined and
discussed. And it must be well understood that every such question must
be treated by _five_; and that it does not belong to _one_ or to _two_
cabinets to settle, separately or apart, interests which may affect the
whole of Europe.” The allies of Turkey also added, “that the Treaty of
1841, in the meaning of which all are this day agreed, is to serve as
the basis of operations. All the powers who have signed that treaty are
qualified to appeal to it. We present ourselves as the defenders of that
treaty, violated in its spirit, and as the supporters of the equilibrium
of Europe, menaced by the power which seemed, more than any other, to
have the pretension of constituting herself the guardian of it. The
cause for which we are armed is that of all.” That claim of Turkey to
form part of the European community is precisely the one to which Russia
is inexorably opposed. Its admission would destroy the monopoly of
interference and protection which the Czar wishes to maintain over
Turkey, and we need not therefore be surprised at the stern refusals
which the good offices of any other power have invariably encountered at
St Petersburg. Russia insisted throughout that the question only
regarded Russia and Turkey; it denied the right of any one to interfere,
except in advising Turkey to submit to her dictates; and to the last she
rejected all intervention or mediation. It is true that intervention
menaced the fundamental principle on which the traditional policy of
Russia is based; and the day that the Treaty of 1841 forms part of the
international law of Europe, the designs of Russia on Turkey are at once
arrested. Russia will then have lost all exclusive rights; and all
questions of public interest affecting the Porte must be treated by all
the states who have affixed their signatures to that important
instrument.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account