Blackwood's Edinburgh magazine, Vol. 75, No. 462, April 1854Various
History
Blackwood's Edinburgh magazine, Vol. 75, No. 462, April 1854
Various
England -- Periodicals; Scotland -- Periodicals
We must not, therefore, blind ourselves to consequences, which, in so
far as human judgment can go, appear to be inevitable. We may be able to
disperse or even to annihilate the Russian fleets in the Baltic and the
Black seas—we may be able to prevent the colossal northern power from
crossing the Danube, or even beat it back from the Principalities—but
the contest will not end there. We are on the verge of a general
European embroilment, in which there will not only be wars, but bloody
revolutions; and as we have been the first to enter, so we must be the
last to withdraw. We do not say this for the purpose of checking
enthusiasm—God forbid! We are already committed to the struggle; and if
in the minds of any there has lingered a doubt as to the propriety of
Christian intervention for the maintenance of a Mahometan power in
Europe, that ought to be dispelled by the revelations recently made of
the objects of the Russian ambition. The Czar is no crusader; nor is he
influenced by any tender regard for the religious liberties of the
Christian population dwelling beneath the government of the Sultan. He
has set his eyes upon Turkey, just as Catherine in 1772 fixed hers upon
Poland, and he has had the astounding effrontery to propose that Great
Britain should take part in the spoliation. Here is his own proposition,
as communicated to Lord John Russell, by Sir G. H. Seymour, in his
despatch of 22d February 1853:—
“The Emperor went on to say that, in the event of the dissolution of
the Ottoman empire, he thought it might be less difficult to arrive at
a satisfactory territorial arrangement than was commonly believed.
‘The Principalities are,’ he said, ‘in fact an independent state under
my protection; this might so continue. Servia might receive the same
form of government. So again with Bulgaria. There seems to be no
reason this province should not form an independent state. As to
Egypt, I quite understand the importance to England of that territory.
_I can then only say that if, in the event of a distribution of the
Ottoman succession upon the fall of the empire, you should take
possession of Egypt, I shall have no objections to offer. I would say
the same thing of Candia: that island might suit you, and I do not
know why it should not become an English possession._’”
Such was the language used by the Emperor of Russia to the British
minister at the Court of St Petersburg, and we really cannot imagine
anything more absolutely infamous. It was a bribe, tendered evidently in
the belief that it would be accepted; and the offer ought to have been
at once most indignantly repelled. Was it so? We shall see presently—for
the correspondence recently published is far too remarkable and
momentous to be passed over with a single extract from its contents.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account