The virtuous _Heraldo_ daily came out with fierce philippics upon the
“rebel and traitor,” who had deserted his Queen because he deemed that
she had deserted the country and broken her oath, and who, by so doing,
had exchanged large emoluments, high rank, and one of the best positions
his profession affords in Spain, for the uncertain fate of an insurgent
leader—perhaps, in the end, for a short shrift and a firing party. The
men of the _Heraldo_ could not understand this; they felt that _they_
were incapable of such conduct; in their heart of hearts they must have
thought Dulce more remarkable as a fool than as a rebel, but in their
paper they contented themselves with abusing him as the latter. Inexpert
with the pen, Dulce nevertheless took it up to reply. On the 1st of
July, the day after the drawn fight of Vicálvaro, and in a village close
to the scene of action, he wrote a letter, whose faulty style and
soldierly abruptness are the best evidence of its being his own
unassisted production. As a characteristic production, and in justice to
its writer, who will doubtless be blamed by many in foreign countries,
where the facts of the case and the extent of the sacrifices he has made
are imperfectly known and appreciated, I give you a translation of the
letter. It is addressed to the editors of the _Heraldo_, and runs as
follows:—
“Since you have allowed the publication in your periodical of an article
referring to me personally, and to my conduct, and as I consider that an
insult is not a reason, I trust you will be pleased to publish my
protest against the whole of your accusation, by doing which you will
fulfil your duty as public writers.
“I do not wish to prejudge the issue of our enterprise; whatever that
may be it will not surprise me, or make me repent what I have done. That
I may not be disappointed, the worst that I expect is to die in the
field of battle or in the _Campo de Guardias_ (the place of military
executions at Madrid). Whatever occurs, I shall have acted according to
my conscience.
“I seek neither places nor honours, for I have them in abundance. No
desire of revenge of any kind has moved me, for I cherish neither
dislike nor resentment against the persons composing the present
government, and much less against the Queen. The cause of my
insurrection is entirely the memory that I have of the oath taken by the
King of Castile when he ascends the throne. He swears upon the Holy
Scriptures to observe and enforce the law of the State—‘_and if I should
not do so, I desire not to be obeyed_.’
“My conviction is, that the Queen has violated her oath, and, in this
case, I prefer being guilty of _leze-majesty_ to being guilty of
_leze-nation_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account