Blackwood's Edinburgh magazine, Vol. 76, No. 467, September 1854Various
History
Blackwood's Edinburgh magazine, Vol. 76, No. 467, September 1854
Various
England -- Periodicals; Scotland -- Periodicals
were esteemed, the barbarity of colouring was not renewed.
In his “Description of a House,” he says, “Over against the door, upon
the wall, there is the Temple of Minerva in relief, where you may see
the goddess in white marble, without her accoutrements of war.” The
painter, it may be fairly conjectured, painted inside on the wall of the
house, the common aspect, and the white marble statue.
In his “Baths of Hippias,” he mentions “two noble pieces of antiquity in
marble of Health and Æsculapius.” Nor does he omit noticing paint, and
that vermilion—but where is it? “Then you come to a hot passage of
Numidian stone, that brings you to the last apartment, glittering with a
bright vermilion, bordering on purple.”
According to Mr Owen Jones’s theory, all these exquisite works in white
marble are to be considered as unfinished; if they have not been handed
over to the painter, they should be now. Why did Phidias and Praxiteles
so elaborate to the mark of truth their performances? The reader will be
astonished to learn the reason from Mr Owen Jones. It was from the
necessity of the subsequent finish by paints!
“People are apt to argue that Phidias never could have taken such pains
to study the light and shade of this bas-relief, if the fineness of his
workmanship had had to be stopped up when bedaubed with paint.” It is
astonishing that not a glimmering of common sense was here let in upon
the work of Phidias, while the whole light of his understanding showed
the effect of his own handiwork on the plaster; for he, in that case,
says, “But when the plaster has further to be painted with four coats of
oil-paint to stop the suction, it may readily be imagined how much the
more delicate modulations of the surface will suffer.” Does he suppose
that the eyes of Phidias, and of people in that age, were blind to the
suffering of these nice modulations from the stucco, or over-coats of
paint? But why did Phidias so finish his works?—hear the polychromatic
oracle “Now, people who argue thus have never understood what colour
does when applied to form. The very fact that colour has to be applied,
demands the highest finish in the form beneath. By more visibly bringing
out the form, it makes all defects more prominent. Let any one compare
the muscles of the figures in white with the muscles of those coloured,
and he will not hesitate an instant to admit this truth. The labours of
Phidias, had they never received colour, would have been thrown away; it
was because he designed them to receive colour, that such an elaboration
of the surface was required.” This is the most considerable
inconsiderate nonsense imaginable. Common sense says, that one even
colour, or absence of colour, gives equal shadows, according to the
sculptor’s design; but if you colour portions of the same work
differently, the unity of shadows will be destroyed, for shadows will
assimilate themselves to the various colourings, be they light or dark.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account