A marked difference is likewise observable in the style of ornamental
art under the earlier and later dynasties. What principally
distinguishes Assyrian from Egyptian sculpture is, that the former is
entirely free from the angular mode of treatment so conspicuous in the
latter. It is more florid, and altogether more advanced; but at the same
time it must be said, that in regard to accuracy we incline to place
greater estimation upon the portrait-sculpture of Egypt than upon that
of Assyria. In the later monuments of Nineveh we find direct, although
not very extensive, traces of Egyptian influence; but the principal
distinction between the earlier and later sculptures is, the greater
knowledge of design and composition displayed in the former. The
bas-relief representing the Lion-hunt, now in the British Museum, is a
good illustration of the earliest school of Assyrian art yet discovered.
It far exceeds the later sculptures in the vigour of treatment, the
elegance of the forms, and in what the French aptly term _mouvement_,—as
well as by the evident attempt at composition, the artistical
arrangement of the groups. The sculptors who worked at Khorsabad and
Kouyunjik perhaps possessed more skill in handling their tools, and
their work is frequently superior to that of the earlier artists in
delicacy of execution—as, for instance, in the details of the
features—and in boldness of relief; but they are decidedly inferior to
their ancestors in the higher branches of art—in the treatment of a
subject, and in beauty and variety of form.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account