Footnote 111: _Essay_, p. 257. Footnote 112: _Lect. on Astron._, 2d edit. (1849.) Footnote 113: Pp. ix. x. Footnote 114: _More Worlds than One_, p. 176. Footnote 115: _Essay_, p. 211. Footnote 116: _Essay_, pp. 235–236. Footnote 117: _Dial._, p. 18. Footnote 118: _Essay_, p. 214. Footnote 119: Ibid., p. 216. Footnote 120: _More Worlds than One_, p. 215. Footnote 121: _Essay_, p. 298. Footnote 122: _More Worlds than One_, p. 315, and note. Footnote 123: Ibid., p. 315. Footnote 124: Romans, i. 22. Footnote 125: Matthew, vii. 26. Footnote 126: _Dialogue_, p. 74. Footnote 127: Isaiah, lxiv. 4; 1 Cor., ii. 9. Footnote 128: John, xiv. 2, 23. Footnote 129: _Dialogue_, p. 42. Footnote 130: _Wisdom of God in the Worlds of Creation_, vol. iii. p. 265. Footnote 131: _Monthly Magazine_, A.D. 1798—art. “Walpoliana.” Footnote 132: Matthew, vii. 24. Footnote 133: This must evidently mean Loufti Pasha, who was grand vizier from A.D. 1539 to 1541. Footnote 134: This passage may be admitted as a proof that the tribute of children was not regularly exacted from the population of the capital. The difficulty Mohammed the Second found in repeopling Constantinople explains the exemption. Footnote 135: _Glasgow Records_, ii. 341. Footnote 136: Ibid., p. 343. Footnote 137: Ibid., p. 422. Footnote 138: “Gladios, pugiones sicas machæras rhomphæas acinaces fustes, præsertim si præferrati vel plumbati sint, veruta missilia tela sclopos tormenta bombardas balistas ac arma ulla bellica nemo discipulus gestato.”—_Fasti Aberdonienses_, 242. The Glasgow list is less formidable: “Nemo gladium pugionem tormenta bellica aut aliud quodvis armorum et telorum genus gestet; sed apud præfectum omnia deponat.”—_Instituta_, 49. Footnote 139: _Instituta Univ. Glasg._, p. 519, 520. Footnote 140: _Fasti Univ. Glasg._, p. 548. Footnote 141: _Hist. Univ. Paris_, iv. 266. Footnote 142: _Fasti_, p. 400. Footnote 143: Ibid., p. 400. Footnote 144: There was an attempt to _enforce_ returns upon religious and educational statistics, but, in the words of the Report, “It was, however, considered doubtful whether, upon a rigid construction, the Census Act rendered it compulsory upon parties to afford information upon these particulars; and the inquiry was, therefore, pursued as a purely voluntary investigation.”—_Report_, No. 1. Footnote 145: “The weight of the schedules, blank enumeration-books, and other forms despatched from the Central Office, exceeded fifty-two tons.”—_Report_, No. 1. Footnote 146: