The Greeks are in the habit of boasting that their Church preserved
their nationality under the Turks. Considering the subserviency of the
great body of the Greek clergy during that period, and the readiness
with which they acted as spies and policemen for the Othoman government,
we own that we entertain a very different opinion. We think it would be
nearer the truth to assert that the people, having perpetuated their
existence by the toleration of their conquerors, preserved their
nationality by their municipal organisation, and that this preservation
of their nationality was the cause of their ecclesiastical establishment
surviving. Mohammed II. reconstituted the patriarchate of
Constantinople, after he had conquered the city, merely as a branch of
the Othoman administration. Mr Masson and other enthusiasts fancy they
can discern Presbyterian doctrines in the Greek Church. It may be the
case. We have heard that chemists find gold in strawberries; but the
gold rarely sits heavy on the stomachs of those who eat strawberries,
and we opine that the Presbyterian doctrines of the Greek Church never
prevent its votaries from worshipping images. So, in the anecdote we are
going to extract from the Patriarchal History, we find that the Greeks
regard violations of truth and honour as venial offences, if not
absolutely meritorious acts, whenever they are supposed to have turned
to the profit of their ecclesiastical establishment.
“During the reign of the Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent, when Toulphi
Pasha was grand vizier,[133] the attention of the Sublime Porte was
called to the circumstance that the duty of the caliph of the Mohammedan
faith required the destruction of all places of worship belonging to
Infidels in every city which the true believers had taken with the
sword. Now, as Mohammed II. had taken Constantinople by storm, it was
the sultan’s duty to destroy all the Christian churches within the
walls; and all the plagues and fires which had desolated the city, and
which, it was observed, generally consumed more Turkish than Greek
property, evidently arose from the Divine anger at the neglect of this
important command of the Prophet. Sultan Suleiman was said to have
consulted the mufti on the necessity of only tolerating places of
worship for the Christians without the walls; and it was believed that
the mufti had delivered a fetva, authorising the destruction of all the
Greek churches in Constantinople. Sultan Suleiman then issued an order
to his grand vizier, commanding him to carry the fetva into execution.
At this time Jeremiah was patriarch of Constantinople.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account