mixed Constitution is now so demonstrated, that every man may now say
what he thinks publicly and without reserve. Even men who have been all
their lives supporters of the “Liberal” party—men who, up to the last
moment, were in favour of a farther degradation of the franchise—now see
the folly of their course, and, moreover, have an excuse for avowing
their change of opinion. Hence it is that England is now all of one
mind. And what is that, we repeat, but that all England is Conservative,
and that the Liberal party in office is an anachronism?
There might be some excuse for this anomalous position of affairs, if
the Liberal Ministry ever professed to believe that Liberal principles
are still popular. But they do not—they cannot. After nearly ten years
of selfish and most reckless trafficking in Reform Bills, Lord Russell
himself repudiated his own work. He abandoned it in the same spirit of
selfishness as he took it up. It was in the hope of reviving his faded
popularity that he first proposed a further Reform Bill in the end of
1851; and, backed by a party as insincere as himself, he kept playing
off his precious Bill, year after year, as a convenient party manœuvre
against his Conservative rivals. But no sooner, when reinstated in
office, did he and his colleagues find that they were about to be “hoist
with their own petard,” than the Bill was shelved. Reform was not only
abandoned, but treated with contempt by the Whig occupants of the
Treasury Bench; and the Minister who had once shed tears when forced by
his colleagues to postpone his Bill, at length, on the 5th of February
1861, not only buried Reform, but, like a wild Irishman, danced upon its
grave! In their projects of ecclesiastical innovation, the members of
the present Ministry have been equally defeated. When baffled in their
attacks upon the State, they still thought it was a popular thing to
assault the Church. In this also they have at length been undeceived:
and now what have they left to do? They have not a single card left to
play. Their whole list of measures, after having been deliberately
considered by the nation, has been condemned and rejected with contempt.
Like the Federal generals at Fredericksburg, they have tried attack
after attack upon every part of their rivals’ position, and with every
man they could muster, only to see every attack fail, and recoil in
ruinous loss upon themselves. The Federal general, when condemned to
inaction and menaced by a superior force, wisely abandoned his ground,
and put a river between himself and his foe. It is time the Whig
Ministry should execute a similar “strategic movement,” if they do not
wish to fare worse than General Burnside, and be kicked across the
Rappahannock, instead of avoiding a catastrophe by a timely retreat.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account