Though there will be a temporary truce, we fear the conduct of the
Government, whether as represented by Mr Gladstone or by Lord Russell,
will not be such as the Conservative Opposition can approve. Even apart
from its acts, the position of the Ministry is so unnatural, and its
reputation so tarnished and discredited, that it cannot possibly hope
for a much longer respite. Every week its position is becoming more
untenable. In vain do its friends endeavour to frame apologies for its
defeats and pleas for its existence. In vain does the leading journal at
one time claim as a merit for the Premier that he has “no principles;”
in vain does it, at another, seek to intimidate electors by declaring
that “unprincipled constituencies make unscrupulous Governments.” We
should have thought that “unprincipled constituencies” were the very
ones to support a Premier with no “principles.” However, as the
subsequent election at Totnes showed, the threat was no idle word: and
Government influence and the most tyrannical pressure were employed to
coerce the free action of that constituency. But this course also has
failed. At Totnes the Government simply escaped defeat: Liberals were
returned as Liberals had been before. But at Devonport, another pocket
borough of the Ministry, the Government was defeated, and for the first
time for several elections a Conservative headed the poll. Ministerial
tyranny had been carried too far. It succeeded in the first instance,
but would not be brooked in the second. The “unscrupulous Government”
has received a check in the corrupt exercise of its powers which it can
never forget. It was at once a triumph for Conservatism and for the
principle of freedom of election. We do not wonder that Mr Ferrand, when
he took his seat in the House, should be received with hearty
acclamations from the Conservatives, who crowded the Opposition benches
to do him honour. The Conservative party is now stronger by eleven
votes—counting twenty-two on a division—since June 1859, when the united
Whigs and Radicals succeeded in overthrowing Lord Derby’s Government by
a majority of only thirteen.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account