So that English village life now resolves itself mainly into that of the
parson; for the squire, even if he be resident, scarcely forms part of
the same social circle. And as to the rest, between the university
graduate, of more or less refinement and education, and the opulent
farmer such as he is at present, there lies a gulf which no fancy can
exaggerate, and which the best intentions on both sides fail to bridge
over. Where village spires stand thick together, where the majority of
the rectors or vicars are men of the same way of thinking, and where it
is the fashion of the country to be social, there is a good deal of
pleasant intercourse, no doubt, between the parsons’ families, and as
much “society,” in the real if not in the conventional sense, as is
needful to keep the higher elements of humanity from stagnating; but
where parishes spread far and wide over a poor or thinly-populated
district, or, worse still, where religious sectarianism reckons its
clergy into “High” and “Low,” and the Rector of A. shakes his head and
lifts his eyebrows when any allusion is made to the Vicar of B.—there,
the man whose lot has been cast in a country parsonage had need have
abundant resources within himself, and be supremely indifferent to the
stir of human interests without. He will, in many cases, have almost as
far to ride in search of a congenial neighbour as though he were in the
bush of Australia; he will find something like the solitude of the old
monastery, without the chance of its peace and quietness.
Not that such a life is dull or uninteresting, by any means, unless in
the unfortunate case of the man finding no interest in his duties. One
of this world’s many compensations is, that the busy man, be he what
else he may, is never dull, and seldom discontented. So it is, almost
always, in the country parsonage; without claiming any high standard of
zeal or self-devotion for its occupants, there is probably at least as
much quiet enjoyment, and as little idle melancholy or fretful
discontent, to be found among them, as among any other class of educated
men.
Still, it is a life which it would be very difficult for a foreigner to
appreciate or understand. The relation of the English country rector to
his villagers is totally unlike that of the Lutheran or Roman Catholic
priest. Not claiming—or at least not being in a position to
maintain—anything like the amount of spiritual authority which is
exercised by the pastor under both these other systems, he wields, in
point of fact, an amount of influence superior to either. He cannot
command the servile and terrified obedience in externals which is often
paid by the Irish and Italian peasant to his spiritual guide; but he
holds a moral power over his parishioners—even over those who
professedly decline his ministrations—of the extent of which neither he
nor they are always conscious, but to the reality of which the enemies
of the Established Church in England are beginning to awake.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account