caught; and after retorting with, “How, rascal, do you dare to call
yourself my prisoner when I have only sent to speak with you?” he
composed himself to the delivery of the rebuke he had been preparing in
this fashion: “It is by such talkers and jesters of the Parliament of
Paris and of the king’s chamber as you, that the kingdom is governed;
and you manage the king as you please, to do good or evil according to
your wills: there is not a prince of the blood, however great he may be,
if he incur your hatred, who will be listened to; but such fellows shall
yet be hanged until the gibbets be full of them.” Bournazel carried this
pleasant announcement and the whole transaction to the throne, and the
king took his part, saying to those around, “He has kept his ground
well: I would not for twenty thousand francs it had not so happened.”
The embassy to Scotland was thus for the time frustrated. It was said
that there were English cruisers at hand to intercept the ambassador,
and that he himself had no great heart for a sojourn in the wild unknown
northern land. Possibly the fifteen days’ lording it at Sluys may have
broken in rather inconveniently on his outfit; but the most likely cause
of the defeat of the first French embassy to our shores was, the
necessity felt by Bournazel to right himself at once at court, and turn
the flank of his formidable enemies; and Froissart says, the Earl of
Flanders lay under the royal displeasure for having, in his vain
vaunting, defeated so important a project as the mission to the Scots.
A few years afterwards our country received a visit, less august, it is
true, than the intended embassy, but far more interesting. In 1384,
negotiations were exchanged near the town of Boulogne for a permanent
peace between England and France. The French demanded concessions of
territory which could not be yielded, and a permanent peace, founded on
a final settlement of pending claims, was impossible. A truce even was
at that time, however, a very important conclusion to conflict; it
sometimes lasted for years, being in reality a peace under protest that
each party reserved certain claims to be kept in view when war should
again break out. Such a truce was adjusted between England on the one
side and France on the other—conditional on the accession of her allies
Spain and Scotland. France kept faith magnanimously, in ever refusing to
negotiate a separate peace or truce for herself; but, as the way is with
the more powerful of two partners, she was apt to take for granted that
Scotland would go with her, and that the affair was virtually finished
by her own accession to terms.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account