England who had been at the conference at Bolinghen, had not acted very
honourably when they had consented to order their men to march to
Scotland and burn the country, knowing that a truce would speedily be
concluded: and the best excuse they could make was, that it was the
French and not they who were to signify such truce to the Scots.”
Smarting from this inroad, the Scots lords, and especially the Douglases
and others on the border, were in no humour to coincide with their
peaceful King. They desired to talk the matter over with the
representatives of the adventurers in some quiet place; and, for reasons
which were doubtless sufficient to themselves, they selected for this
purpose the church of St Giles in Edinburgh. The conference was highly
satisfactory to the adventurers, who spurred back to Perth to impart the
secret intelligence that though the king had accepted the truce, the
lords were no party to it, but would immediately prepare an expedition
to avenge Nottingham and Northumberland’s raid. This was joyful
intelligence, though in its character rather surprising to followers of
the French court. A force was rapidly collected, and in a very few days
the adventurers were called to join it in the Douglases’ lands.
So far Froissart. This affair is not, at least to our knowledge,
mentioned in detail by any of our own annalists writing before the
publication of his Chronicles. Everything, however, is there set forth
so minutely, and with so distinct and accurate a reference to actual
conditions in all the details, that few things in history can be less
open to doubt. Here, however, we come to a statement inviting question,
when he says that the force collected so suddenly by the Scots lords
contained fifteen thousand mounted men; nor can we be quite reconciled
to the statement though their steeds were the small mountain horses
called hackneys. The force, however, was sufficient for its work. It
found the English border trusting to the truce, and as little prepared
for invasion as Nottingham and Northumberland had found Scotland. The
first object was the land of the Percies, which the Scots, in the
laconic language of the chronicler, “pillaged and burnt.” And so they
went onwards; and where peasants had been peacefully tilling the land or
tending their cattle amid the comforts of rude industry, there the
desolating host passed, the crops were trampled down—their owners left
dead in the ashes of their smoking huts—and a few widows and children,
fleeing for safety and food, was all of animal life left upon the scene.
The part, indeed, taken in it by his countrymen was exactly after
Froissart’s own heart, since they were not carrying out any of the
political movements of the day, nor were they even actuated by an
ambition of conquest, but were led by the sheer fun of the thing and the
knightly spirit of adventure to partake in this wild raid. To the Scots
it was a substantial affair, for they came back heavy-handed, with
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account