The poverty of the Scots proceeded from a cause of which they need not
have been ashamed; yet, with the reserve and pride ever peculiar to
them, they hated that it should be seen by their allies, and when these
showed any indications of contempt or derision, the natives were stung
to madness. Froissart renders very picturesquely the common talk about
the strangers, thus:—“What devil has brought them here? or, who has sent
for them? Cannot we carry on our wars with England without their
assistance? We shall never do any good as long as they are with us. Let
them be told to go back again, for we are sufficient in Scotland to
fight our own battles, and need not their aid. We neither understand
their language nor they ours, so that we cannot converse together. They
will very soon cut up and destroy all we have in this country, and will
do more harm if we allow them to remain among us than the English could
in battle. If the English do burn our houses, what great matter is it to
us? We can rebuild them at little cost, for we require only three days
to do so, so that we but have five or six poles, with boughs to cover
them.”
The French knights, accustomed to abject submission among their own
peasantry, were loth to comprehend the fierce independence of the Scots
common people, and were ever irritating them into bloody reprisals. A
short sentence of Froissart’s conveys a world of meaning on this
specialty: “Besides, whenever their servants went out to forage, they
were indeed permitted to load their horses with as much as they could
pack up and carry, but they were waylaid on their return, and
villanously beaten, robbed, and sometimes slain, insomuch that no varlet
dare go out foraging for fear of death. In one month the French lost
upwards of a hundred varlets; for when three or four went out foraging,
not one returned, in such a hideous manner were they treated.” As we
have seen, a not unusual incident of purveying in France was, that the
husbandman was hung up by the heels and roasted before his own fire
until he disgorged his property. The Scots peasantry had a decided
prejudice against such a process, and, being accustomed to defend
themselves from all oppression, resisted even that of their allies, to
the extreme astonishment and wrath of those magnificent gentlemen. There
is a sweet unconsciousness in Froissart’s indignant denunciation of the
robbing of the purveyors, which meant the pillaged peasantry recovering
their own goods. But the chronicler was of a thorough knightly nature,
and deemed the peasantry of a country good for nothing but to be used
up. Hence, in his wrath, he says: “In Scotland you will never find a man
of worth; they are like savages, who wish not to be acquainted with any
one, and are too envious of the good fortune of others, and suspicious
of losing anything themselves, for their country is very poor. When the
English make inroads thither, as they have very frequently done, they
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account