Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine, Vol. 93, No. 570, April, 1863Various
History
Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine, Vol. 93, No. 570, April, 1863
Various
England -- Periodicals; Scotland -- Periodicals
Too universally agreeable not to amuse those present at the expense of
those absent, still, even in sarcasm, he never seemed to be ill-natured.
As one of his associates had a louder reputation for wit than his own,
so it was his modest habit to father upon that professed _diseur de bons
mots_ any more pointed epigram that occurred spontaneously to himself.
“I wonder,” said a dandy of another dandy who was no Adonis, “why on
earth —— has suddenly taken to cultivate those monstrous red whiskers.”
“Ah,” quoth my pleasant fine gentleman, “I think for my part they become
his style of face very much; A—— says ‘that they plant out his
ugliness.’” For the rest, in all graver matters, if the man he last
dined with committed some act which all honest men blamed, my
misanthrope evinced his gentle surprise, not at the act, but the
blame—“What did you expect?” he would say, with an adorable indulgence,
“he was a man—_like yourselves_!”
Sprung from one of the noblest lineages in Christendom—possessed of a
fortune which he would smilingly say “was not large enough to allow him
to give a shilling to any one else,” but which, prudently spent on
himself, amply sufficed for all the elegant wants of a man so
emphatically single—this darling of fashion had every motive conceivable
to an ordinary understanding not to be himself that utter rogue which he
assumed every other fellow-creature to be. Nevertheless, he was too
nobly consistent to his creed to suffer his example to be at variance
with his doctrine; and here he had an indisputable advantage over Timon
and Alceste, who had no right, when calling all men rogues, to belie
their assertion by declining to be rogues themselves. His favourite
amusement was whist, and in that game his skill was so consummate that
he had only to play fairly in order to add to his income a sum which,
already spending on himself all that he himself required, he would not
have known what to do with. But, as he held all men to be cheats, he
cheated on principle. It was due to the honour of his philosophy to show
his utter disdain of the honour which impostors preached, but which only
dupes had the folly to practise. If others did not mark the aces and
shuffle up the kings as he did, it was either because they were too
stupid to learn how, or too cowardly to risk the chance of exposure. He
was not as stupid, he was not as cowardly, as the generality of men. It
became him to show his knowledge of their stupidity and his disdain of
their cowardice. _Bref_—he cheated!—long with impunity: but, as Charron
says, _L’homme se pique_—man cogs the dice for his own ruin. At last he
was suspected, he was watched, he was detected. But the first thought of
his fascinated victims was not to denounce, but to warn him—kindly
letters conveying delicate hints were confidentially sent to him: he was
not asked to disgorge, not exhorted to repent; let bygones be bygones,
only for the future, would he, in playing with his intimate associates,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account