Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine, Vol. 93, No. 570, April, 1863Various
History
Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine, Vol. 93, No. 570, April, 1863
Various
England -- Periodicals; Scotland -- Periodicals
Lord Macaulay, who could not have had before him the materials for
forming a judgment which Mr Spedding has now placed within the reach of
us all, wrote of Essex and Bacon in the following strain:—“The person on
whom, during the decline of his influence, he chiefly depended, to whom
he confided his perplexities, whose advice he solicited, whose
intercession he employed, was his friend Bacon. The lamentable truth
must be told. This friend, so loved, so trusted, bore a principal part
in ruining the Earl’s fortunes, in shedding his blood, and in blackening
his memory.” A more unfortunate sentence, or one more replete with
error, was never penned. It would be ungenerous to revive it in presence
of the lucid statement of facts which Mr Spedding has given us, if it
were not the case that many are still under the impressions derived from
this eloquent essay. Essex, as we have seen, was very far from confiding
his perplexities to Bacon, or soliciting his advice in those latter days
of his life; and Bacon was so far from being instrumental to his ruin,
that no advocacy on earth could have saved him. Nor can it be said that
he blackened the memory of Essex, for neither on the trial, nor in the
narrative which he subsequently drew up of the whole transaction, is the
guilt of Essex overcharged. Nay, with the materials before us, the
historian could add some very dark strokes to the picture; for he could
show that, even at a time when Essex was receiving nothing but favours
from the Court, he was meditating treason; and he could add that, in his
last moments, he tarnished even his character for generosity by
needlessly including others, hitherto unsuspected, in his guilt.
What could have been, we are tempted to ask, the hopes of Essex, or what
his final purpose in this act of rebellion? Where could he have stopped?
how found safety for himself in any measure short of a deposition of the
Queen? He must have known that if, by overpowering her guard and putting
a personal constraint upon her, he obliged the Queen to reinstate him in
his former command, yet that the moment such force was withdrawn he
would have been dismissed again, and exposed to the resentment of a
proud and injured sovereign. A subject who goes so far must go farther
still. Elizabeth must have been deposed, and James prematurely thrust
into her place. It has been even suggested that Essex had some wild
dream of filling the throne himself. He was to play Bolingbroke, and
Elizabeth Richard II.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account