Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine, Vol. 93, No. 570, April, 1863Various
History
Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine, Vol. 93, No. 570, April, 1863
Various
England -- Periodicals; Scotland -- Periodicals
We for our part have always noticed that when a man talks much about
“Baconian philosophy,” he is going to stuff into our ears some
incredible nonsense. He who has good evidence to bring forward—trusts at
once to his evidence. Phrenologists, mesmerists, spiritualists, all who
have a very weak case, are great discoursers on the rules of induction.
They eke out their defective reasoning by proving to us, whether we are
aware of it or not, that they are very good reasoners. Most readers,
fortunately for themselves, are satisfied with a few brilliant passages
of the ‘Novum Organum.’ If they proceeded farther, they might find that
not only did it not assist them in their researches after physical
truth, but that it embarrassed them considerably as to the real nature
of physical science, and the kind of truth to be sought for.
Bacon was a great writer, a great thinker, but he was not “the father of
modern philosophy.” If we are to have fathers in science, the title must
be given to such men as Galileo, Kepler, Newton. He who discovers one
great scientific truth does more even for the logic of science than any
writer upon that logic can perform.
Science does not stand in _contradiction_ to the metaphysical or ethical
discussions of ancient or of modern times. There is no _contrast_ such
as is popularly described between the old philosophy and the new. But a
vast _addition_ has been made to one kind of our knowledge. And with
regard to that great argument of _utility_ which Lord Macaulay has so
eloquently developed, it must be borne in mind that the utility of the
physical sciences made itself known by certain individual discoveries
and inventions, not by mere abstract contemplation of what the study of
nature might produce. In fact, the utility of the pursuit was the very
argument which Socrates made use of to draw men _from_ the study of
objective nature to the study of themselves. As matters then stood, more
seemed likely to be effected by regulating the mind of man than by
observing the winds or the clouds, or any of the phenomena of nature.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account