Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine, Vol. 93, No. 570, April, 1863Various
History
Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine, Vol. 93, No. 570, April, 1863
Various
England -- Periodicals; Scotland -- Periodicals
Mr Graham’s next effort was made during that eventful autumn session
when Parliament met in consequence of the Peterloo affair, and the
Government demanded powers beyond those of the constitution, to deal
with the dangers which threatened the country. One of the bills which
Ministers proposed, with a view to stop the organised agitation which
Radical delegates kept up, prohibited all persons, not resident in a
town, or being freeholders, from taking any part in the proceedings of a
town meeting. Here was an opportunity which the ambitious member for
Hull could not possibly allow to escape. He rose to demand whether the
member for a borough, being neither the inhabitant of such borough nor a
freeman, would come within the meaning of the Act; and when, to his
great indignation, nobody seemed inclined to reply, he had the
imprudence to argue the case, and to state it as peculiarly his own.
Just at that moment a sound of suppressed laughter was heard in the
House, whereupon the member for Hull lost his head, and, after rambling
on for a few minutes without a single cheer to sustain him, sat down,
retaining no recollection either of what he had said, or of what he
meant to say. “There’s an end of Graham,” exclaimed Mr Henry Lascelles,
jeeringly; “we shall hear no more of him.” But Mr Lascelles was
mistaken.
Nothing daunted by this discomfiture, the baffled senator stood up again
when the bill went into committee. This time he had carefully prepared
his speech, and the House listened to it, without, however, evincing any
signs that it approved. He was still on the losing side in politics; and
though his friends saw that there was good stuff in him, even they
scarcely ventured to hope that he would ever prove more than a useful
second-rate orator, and a good man of business whenever matters of
detail came to be considered.
The death of George III. in February 1820 warned the House of Commons
that its days were numbered. The Government was desirous of
precipitating the dissolution; and the Opposition took, in consequence,
an early opportunity to hamper them, as far as might be, by a small
reform bill. Lord John Russell proposed that the writs for Grampound,
Penrhyn, Barnstaple, and Camelford, should be suspended, in order to
afford the new Parliament an opportunity of inquiring into the
corruption with which these boroughs were charged. But Lord John’s
motion, which Mr Graham supported, though successful in the Lower House,
was thrown out in the Upper, and the members dispersed, each to look
after his own interest as he best might.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account