Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine, Vol. 93, No. 570, April, 1863Various
History
Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine, Vol. 93, No. 570, April, 1863
Various
England -- Periodicals; Scotland -- Periodicals
Sir James sat below the gangway, on the Ministerial side of the House,
while those gyrations went on which ended in shaking Earl Grey out of
the Premier’s chair, and Lord Melbourne into it. With Mr Stanley, and
the half-dozen friends who adhered to him, Sir James kept aloof from
each of the rival parties, becoming one of the company who, as Mr
O’Connell described it, “travelled by themselves in the Derby Dilly.” It
is not for us to inquire into the motives which animated the little band
at that time. But considerations of delicacy towards old friends were
surely rated above their just value when they induced Mr Stanley and Sir
James Graham, a few months subsequently, to decline taking office under
Sir Robert Peel. Had they met his advances as frankly as they deserved,
the Conservative Government of 1835 would have probably stood its
ground; and though it be difficult to conceive, looking both at things
present and things past, how the commercial system, now in the
ascendant, could have been pushed aside, still the progress of that
system would have been probably more gradual; it certainly might have
achieved its triumph at a sacrifice less costly than the disruption of
the great Tory party, which followed on the repeal of the Corn Laws in
1846.
Sir James was coldly looked upon by the Liberals for abandoning Earl
Grey’s Administration, and a cabal was got up to resist his re-election
for East Cumberland in the event of his taking office with Sir Robert
Peel. He refused to take office, as we have shown, and defended himself
well at the hustings against the attacks which were made upon him. East
Cumberland chose him again to be its representative, and he again took
his seat below the gangway on the Ministerial side of the House. As an
independent member, however, he stood aloof from the struggle between
Sir Robert Peel and the Whigs, till Lord John Russell brought forward
his famous motion “For the appropriation to secular purposes of a
portion of the Church property in Ireland.” Then Sir James Graham threw
over all party scruples. He delivered against the motion one of the most
telling speeches which he ever uttered in Parliament, and went out into
the gallery with that gallant band which failed to keep their chief in
office by twenty-five votes only. From that moment his severance from
the Whigs became a mere question of time, and the bitterness with which
the Municipal Reform Bill was argued hurried it on. Sir James had never
desired to swamp the poorer voters, either in counties or boroughs, and
voted against the extinction of the class of freemen. Having gone out
with the Tories, he was preparing to cross the House to his old seat,
when a storm of derisive cheering greeted him, accompanied by shouts of
“Stay where you are!” He stopped, looked angrily at the benches whence
the sounds proceeded, and then sat down with a smile of scorn on his
lips on one of the Opposition benches.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account