The Roman empire in ancient times afforded the clearest demonstration of
the truth of these principles; and the fate of their vast dominion shows,
in the most decisive manner, what is the inevitable consequence to which
the free trade principles, now so strongly contended for by a party in
this country, must lead. Alison is the first modern author with whom we
are acquainted, who has traced the decline of the Roman empire in great
part to this source. In the tenth volume of his "History of Europe,"
p. 752, we find the following passage:--
"No nation can pretend to independence which rests for any sensible
protion of its subsistence in ordinary seasons on foreign, who may
become hostile, nations. And if we would see a memorable example of
the manner in which the greatest and most powerful nation may, in the
course of ages, come to be paralysed by this cause, we have only to
cast our eyes on imperial Rome, when the vast extent of the empire
had practically established a free trade in grain with the whole
civilized world; and the result was, that cultivation disappeared
from the Italian plains, that the race of Roman agriculturists, the
strength of the empire, became extinct, that the fields were laboured
only by slaves and cattle. The legions could no longer be recruited
but from foreign bands, vast tracts of pasturage overspread even the
fields of Lombardy and the Compagna of Naples, and it was the
plaintive confession of the Roman annalist, that the mistress of the
world had come to depend for her subsistence on the floods of the
Nile."
This observation has excited, as well it might, the vehement indignation
of the free trade journals. The example of the greates and most powerful
nation that ever existed being weakened, and at length ruined by a free
trade in corn, afforded too cogent an argument, and was too striking a
warning, not to excite the wrath of those who would precipitate Great
Britain into a similar course of policy. They have attacked the author,
accordingly, with unwonted asperity; and, while they admint the ruin of
Italian agriculture in the later stages of the Roman empire, endeavour to
ascribe it to the gratuitous distribution of grain to the Roman populace,
not the effect of a free importation of grain from its Egyptian and
African provinces. The vast importance of the subject has induced us to
look into the original authorities to whom Alison refers in support of his
observation, and from among them we select three--Tacitus, Gibbon, and
Michelet. Tacitus says,
"At Hercule _olim ex Itaila_ legionibus longinquas in provincias
commeatus portabantur, _nec nunc infecunditate laboratur_; sed Africam
_potius et Egyptum exercemus_, navibusque et casibus vita populi
Romani permissa est."--TACITUS, _Annal_. xii. 43.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account