Here it is stated, in the first place, _that from the summer assizes 1842, to the same period in 1843, Ring was nine times proceeded against by ejectment_. Now the landlord could only proceed by ejectment in the quarter-sessions' court, or in the superior courts. The quarter-sessions' courts are held but _four times_ in the year, namely, in January, April, July, and October. The sessions were only held _three times_ within the period during which Ring is said to have been _nine times_ sued by ejectment; and consequently, if Mr Shee were even inclined, it would be impossible for him to have proceeded more than _three times_ against him in the sessions court. But if he instituted his suit in the superior courts, (if defence were taken, as clearly was the case,) he could only have proceeded twice, "for the ejectment served at November should be tried at the spring assizes, and the one served subsequently at the summer assizes;" and the production of any process from the superior courts, or the proof that such was had recourse to, would effectually bar the landlord from proceeding in the inferior courts. He could not proceed in both at the same time; and thus we see that it would be impossible for any landlord, however oppressive, _to have proceeded by ejectment more than three times within the period in which this veracious compiler of grievances positively asserts Shee proceeded nine times_. Next, he says, "the crop of 1842 was sold seven different times," and "altogether he had _twenty auctions of sale_ before midsummer of 1843." Now, any proceeding by distress, pending the progress of the ejectment, would have vitiated it and upset it; for the law does not allow two different modes of proceeding for the same debt at the same time; and in no courts is such scrupulous regard paid to the rights of the tenant as in the quarter-sessions courts. But no decree can be granted in ejectment cases until _a clear year's rent_ shall have been proved to be due; and yet we find this man, Patrick Ring, who, it is asserted, _owed no arrears of rent up to 1842, and the sale of whose crops and stock paid his rent up to autumn 1842_, evicted in summer 1843, when only _half a year's rent could have accrued due_; and this, too, by a Roman Catholic assistant barrister, (Mr O'Gorman,) a judge above any suspicion, and who, if we are to believe the statement contained in Ring's own letter, was not at all partial to his persecutor.