"DISTINCTION BETWEEN THOUGHT AND ATTENTION.--By THOUGHT is
here meant the voluntary reproduction in our own minds of
those states of consciousness, or (_to use a phrase more
familiar to the religious reader_) _of those inward
experiences_, to which, as to his best and most authentic
documents, the teacher of moral and religious truth refers
us. In ATTENTION, we keep the mind _passive_; in THOUGHT, we
rouse it into activity. In the former, we submit to an
impression,--we keep the mind steady in order to receive the
stamp. In the latter, we seek to imitate the artist, while
we ourselves make a copy or duplicate of his work. _We may
learn arithmetic or the elements of geometry by continued
attention alone_; but self-knowledge, or an insight into the
laws and constitution of the human mind, and, the grounds of
religion and true morality, in addition to the effort of
attention, requires the energy of thought."
Now this reference to the word _experience_, as one which would be
more familiar to the religious reader, is pure affectation; because he
must have known that religious people never use that term in the wide
or general sense of states of consciousness, but restrict its meaning
to a very peculiar class of feelings. As to the distinction which is
here laid down, we thought we agreed with Coleridge till we came to
the illustration that was to make all clear. He who has to learn
arithmetic, or geometry must assuredly exercise thought as well as
attention. It is by that "voluntary reproduction" of the ideas
presented to him, by which Coleridge defines thought, that he can
alone fully understand and make the subject his own.
At other times this erratic genius rejoices in astonishing all
philosophically-minded individuals by some extravagance got from the
remotest regions of the religious world. What but some morbid caprice
could have induced him to pen such a paragraph as this:--
"It might be the means of preventing many unhappy marriages,
if the youth of both sexes had it early impressed on their
minds that marriage contracted between Christians is a true
and perfect Symbol or Mystery; that is, the actualising
Faith being supposed to exist in the receivers, it is an
outward sign co-essential with that which it signifies, or a
living part of that, the whole of which it represents."
Coleridge never did seriously think--of that we may be sure--that the
repetition of this _abracadabra_ could be the means "of preventing
many unhappy marriages."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account