Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine, Volume 66, No. 410, December 1849Various
History
Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine, Volume 66, No. 410, December 1849
Various
England -- Periodicals; Scotland -- Periodicals
The more intelligent of the Liberal party are now intent on a different
object, but one equally descriptive of their secret sense of the
failure of their grand panacea of free trade. They are full of the
incalculable effects of the application of science to agriculture;
expatiate largely on the analysis of soils and liquid manures, and
indulge in learned disquisitions on the application of the refuse
of towns and common-sewers to the improvement and fertilisation of
the soil. From the _Edinburgh Review_, which treats its readers to a
learned _exposé_ of Liebig's principles, to Sir R. Peel's protegé, the
Dean of Westminster, who boasts of having tripled the produce of his
land by liquid manure, this is the grand remedy for the evils which
they now see they have introduced. It is singular, if there is any
truth in these discoveries, that though man has been labouring at the
soil for four thousand years, and during that time had an ample supply
of these fertilising streams, they have never been brought to light
till free trade made them a question of life and death to a powerful
party in the state. Having had ample experience of the application of
these liquid manures on the largest and most favourable scale, we are
able to give a decided opinion on this subject. Liquid manures are
of great service in enriching _meadow_ lands, or forcing up _coarse
but luxuriant crops of vegetables, such as cabbage or cauliflower_,
of which the leaves or stems, not the seeds or roots, form an article
of food. But they do not _permanently_ enrich the soil: their effect
is over in a few weeks. A fresh inundation of the fertilising stream
is then requisite, the effects of which are speedily evaporated. On
this account they are wholly inapplicable to grain crops, and of very
doubtful service to potatoes or turnips. In the emphatic language of
farmers, they put no _heart_ into the ground. The vegetation they
force on is entirely in leaves and stems, not in seeds or roots. If
they come into general use, they may increase the determination of the
agricultural industry of the country to grass cultivation, and render
England in modern, as Italy was in ancient times, one great sheet of
pasturage; but they will never overcome the difficulties with which
free trade has environed our farmers in the raising of _grain_ crops,
or enable them to compete with the harvests of the Ukraine, or the
basin of the Mississippi.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account