"The removal of the remains of Napoleon from St Helena was a
fault against his renown. A place of sepulchre in Paris can
never equal the Valley of Slanes. Who would wish to see the
Pillar of Pompey elsewhere than above the grave dug for his
remains by his poor freedman, aided by the old legionary? What
shall we do with those magnificent remains in the midst of
our miseries? Can the hardest granite typify the everlasting
duration of Napoleon's renown? Even if we possessed a Michael
Angelo to design the statue on the grave, how should we fashion
the mausoleum? Monuments are for little men, for the great
a stone and a name. At least they should have suspended the
coffin from the summit of the triumphal arch which records his
exploits: nations from afar should have beheld their master
borne aloft on the shoulders of his victories. Was not the urn
which contained the ashes of Trajan placed at Rome, beneath
his column? Napoleon at Paris will be lost amidst the crowd
of unknown names. God forbid he should be exposed to the
vicissitudes of our political changes, surrounded though he is
by Louis XIV., Vauban, and Turenne. Let a certain section of our
revolutionists triumph, and the ashes of the conqueror will be
sent to join the ashes which our passions have dispersed. The
conqueror will be forgotten in the oppressor of our liberties.
The bones of Napoleon will not reproduce his genius; they will
only teach his despotism to ignoble soldiers."--Vol. vii. 184,
185.
The Restoration did not immediately employ Chateaubriand. His
anticipations were realised. The chorus of baseness and selfishness
with which the court was surrounded, kept him at a distance. They
were afraid of his genius: they were jealous of his reputation.
Above all, they dreaded his independence. He was not sufficiently
manageable. They were actuated, perhaps not altogether without
reason, by the same feeling which made Lord North say, when urged
to bring Dr Johnson into Parliament, whose great powers in the
political warfare of pamphlets had been so signally evinced on the
side of Government, "No, sir, he is an elephant, but a wild one,
as likely to trample under foot his friends as his enemies." The
veteran statesman, so well versed in the ways of men, was right.
Genius is the fountain of thought: it ultimately rules the councils
and destinies of men; but it generally requires to be tempered by
time before it can be safely introduced into practice.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account