"In the year 1216, Dominick the Spaniard and Francis of Assise
met at Rome. They met and embraced, each recognising in the
other the companion predestined to aid the Church in her
conflict with the awakening mental energies so long repressed,
and in her attempt to guide or crush the aspiring, inquiring,
ardent, fervid spirits of the time. Some attempts were made
to induce them to unite into one great body their separate
institutions. Dominick would have complied: it may be that he
thought to find in Francis an instrument as well as an ally.
Francis, perhaps from an intuitive perception of the unyielding
dogmatic character of his friend, stood aloof. They received
from Innocent III. the confirmation of their respective
communities, 'and parted,' as it has been well expressed, 'to
divide the world between them;' for before the end of the
century, nay, in the time of one generation, their followers
had spread themselves in thousands and tens of thousands
over the whole of Christian Europe, and sent forth their
missionaries through every region of the then known world."
The rule of St Augustine was the adoption of both. The stricter
Benedictine rule, though as we have seen how departed from, enjoined
a seclusion from the world. They had, as Mrs Jameson expresses
it, "whereever their influence had worked for good, achieved that
good by gathering the people to them, not by lowering themselves
to the people." The Franciscans and Dominicans, on the contrary,
were to mingle with the people, even in all their domestic concerns
and affections: they were, in this more intimate connection with
the people, to comfort, to exhort, to rebuke. The ministering the
offices of religion was not at first conceded to them. They took the
more humble title of brothers and sisters of mankind--_frati_ and
_suori_--instead of that of fathers, _padri_. The Dominicans called
themselves "preaching friars;" the Franciscans, with greater humility,
called themselves _Frati Minori_, "lesser brothers." In England they
were known as the black and grey friars; but they never reached the
popularity or power of the Benedictines in this country. The remarkable
feature in the institution of these communities was their admittance
of a third class of members, called "the Tertiary Order, or the Third
Order of Penitence." These were of both sexes, and of all ranks: they
were not bound by vows, nor required to relinquish their secular
employments. They were, however, to be strictly moral, and, as far as
they might be, charitable. They were never to take up weapon except
against the enemies of Christ. "Could such a brotherhood," says
Mrs Jameson, "have been rendered universal, and have agreed on the
question, 'Who, among men, Christ himself would have considered as His
enemies?' we should have had a heaven upon earth." The Franciscans and
Dominicans may be considered as one body, the difference being not in
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account