Blood and Iron: Origin of German Empire As Revealed by Character of Its Founder, BismarckGreusel, John Hubert
History
Blood and Iron: Origin of German Empire As Revealed by Character of Its Founder, Bismarck
Greusel, John Hubert
Bismarck, Otto, Fürst von, 1815-1898; Germany -- History -- 1789-1900
¶ In spite of Bismarck's fine hand, Bavaria at first refused to accept
the Iron Chancellor's advices. There is light on this topic in Herr
Ottokar Lorenz's "Foundation of the German Empire," making clear among
other facts that "the German eagle had a narrow escape from dying in
the egg." Twice negotiations were broken off; finally, when the King
of Bavaria tried to get his countrymen behind him in the plan to
proclaim William of Prussia, German Emperor, at Versailles, "it was
only after some hesitation and much regret."
It took the Bavarian Landtag a month to make up its mind! To read the
heated discussions is to destroy the legend that the proclamation of
the Kaiser was by spontaneous demand.
¶ But we must not press these things too far. The fact that King
William had to fight for the magnificent honor he had won for himself
and his country, is merely to say that men are men; nor should we ever
forget that nothing creates so much jealousy as prosperity.
¶ Herr Bismarck had the cleverness to win, at last, and after that
there is little to be added.
For that matter, the much-lauded revolt of the American colonists
against Britain was originally not endorsed by over one-third of the
inhabitants. Yet, with the final victory, like a pack the colonists
went over to the winning side, saying, "We told you so."
¶ We have nothing but praise for the way in which Bismarck created his
Versailles masterpiece. That there was a political squabble behind the
curtain, in Bavaria, was to be expected.
¶ Tell me, did you ever achieve any success that you did not have to
go out and fight for?
It is an amiable fiction that men "recognize" each other's work, in
politics, and "urge" on them rulership over nations. They, too, have
to get out and fight for it!
* * * * *
¶ This necessity for turbulent striving to carry out political ideas
was especially true of Germany during the period of which we write.
Complex conditions long made National Unity a profound problem, not
only in politics but in human nature.
¶ All manner of blacklegs were at work with here and there an honest
man; national oratory was at once visionary, ludicrous and tragical;
fanatics of the bomb, the knife and the poison-cup for years were
abroad in the land. These situations, growing from times past, compel
you to hold with Bismarck that ultimate appeal to the sword was after
all the only hope for a new Germany.
¶ Bismarck did it grossly, but at least he went through with it--call
it militarism or what you please.
¶ For that matter, neither Britain, France, Belgium, (nor the United
States with her 186-odd variants of Christianity in her 186-odd
religious sects), grew out of political cynicism, least of all out of
some aloof system of esoteric idealism.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account