congestion is then released, and at the same time the tube and
cannula, held at the lower end with the right hand in such manner
that the index finger is free, is withdrawn from the vein. At the
moment of withdrawal the end of the cannula is closed with the right
index finger. To prevent hæmorrhage from the donor’s vein, a ligature
previously put round it is tied by an assistant, or pressure on it
is maintained with a sterile swab. The operator must now, without
a moment’s delay, carry the tube filled with blood over to the
recipient. An opening in his vein is made by an assistant in the same
manner as already described, the finger is removed from the cannula,
and its point is instantly introduced into the vein. It is now
necessary to produce some degree of positive pressure in the tube to
ensure that the blood shall at once begin to flow steadily into the
vein. This is done with a rubber bellows, attached by an assistant to
the upper side tube, and the level of the blood in the tube should
at once begin to fall. Great care must be taken that the positive
pressure is released before the tube is completely emptied of blood
in order to avoid the obvious danger of the entry of air into the
patient’s vein. When the tube is nearly empty it is withdrawn, the
vein is ligatured, and the wounds in donor and recipient are sutured.
The most convenient pattern of Kimpton-Brown tube holds only about
500 cc. of blood, so that if more is needed, the process must be
repeated.
There is virtually only one cause of failure in transfusion by this
method, and that is the occurrence of clotting in the cannula or
at the bottom of the tube. If it does occur at any stage of the
operation, it cannot be remedied. It may happen when the tube is
nearly full; if so, the blood that has been withdrawn cannot be used.
Clotting may be due to an imperfection in the paraffin coating on
the glass, but if there is any delay from any cause, it may take
place independently of this. The method is therefore never absolutely
certain of success even in the hands of an expert, and for general
use it is certainly unsuitable. It was introduced into the British
Army by some of the American surgeons in 1917, and was used by the
writer under the guidance of Major Alton of the Harvard Medical Unit
during the first battle of Cambrai with good results. Many of the
English surgeons, however, soon abandoned it as a routine method in
favour of anticoagulants. There are other objections to it besides
its uncertainty. A vein must be exposed by dissection in both donor
and recipient, so that avoidable injury is inflicted on the former.
It is not a perfectly clean method, some blood necessarily escaping
at each successive stage in the process, though an expert can reduce
this to a minimum. In the hands of a novice it may occasion a very
bloody scene. The whole operation is one of urgency, and the best
interests of donor and recipient cannot always be considered.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account