Boche and Bolshevik: Experiences of an Englishman in the German Army and in Russian PrisonsPrice, Hereward Thimbleby
History
Boche and Bolshevik: Experiences of an Englishman in the German Army and in Russian Prisons
Price, Hereward Thimbleby
World War, 1914-1918 -- Personal narratives; World War, 1914-1918 -- Prisoners and prisons, Russian
The franchise, which is supposed to include all those who work for
their living, is a shamelessly artificial one. To take but one
instance. In Irkutsk the Bolsheviks found themselves in a minority
in the Soviet. They thereupon declared that the franchise must be
changed, it was too bourgeois. They succeeded in carrying through a new
principle--that the franchise should belong to “physical labour” only.
All such occupations as demanded education were ruled out. Some of the
more enlightened Bolsheviks tried to obtain the vote for elementary
school-teachers, but they were shouted down. Similar gerrymandering
has taken place in every part of Russia. There is another peculiarity
about the Soviets. They are elected by physical labour; but who
controls them? In no case members of the working-classes. Lenin’s
principle is that the working-man is too stupid to know what is good
for him, and he must be told what to do. Soviet rule is a system by
which a handful of political adventurers first impose themselves on a
party and then impose this party on the State.
[SN: A TYRANNY]
Bolshevism is a tyranny, and like all other tyrannies has great need
of secrecy. Do not let any English readers run away with the idea
that because Lenin published the secret agreements of Kerenski, he is
therefore an enemy of secret diplomacy himself. He concluded the treaty
of Brest-Litovsk with Germany, and the Russian people to this day do
not know all that it pledged them to. At Irkutsk reporters had no right
to be present at the debates of the Soviet, and such reports as did
appear were officially prepared and often issued a month late. At that
time Irkutsk was on the verge of starvation, and it was necessary to
put heart in the people with a promise of plenty. So from time to time
the Soviet officially stated that they had reached an agreement with
China by which the frontier was to be opened. These statements were
deliberate untruths. In a Parliament it would have been possible to
force a debate on this point and make the Government explain why the
frontier was still closed and declare its policy. In view of the fact
that the Union of Democratic Control, the _Manchester Guardian_, Lee
Smith, and others of that kidney have been such staunch supporters of
the Bolsheviks, it is extremely important to realize that under Soviet
rule there is no democratic control at all, and worse secrecy than
there ever was under the Czar.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account