Bodily changes in pain, hunger, fear, and rage : $b an account of recent researches into the function of emotional excitementCannon, Walter B. (Walter Bradford)
Science
Bodily changes in pain, hunger, fear, and rage : $b an account of recent researches into the function of emotional excitement
Cannon, Walter B. (Walter Bradford)
Emotions; Mental health; Mind and body
There remain to be considered, as a possible cause of hunger pangs,
contractions of the stomach and other parts of the alimentary
canal. This suggestion is not new. Sixty-nine years ago Weber[195]
declared his belief that “strong contraction of the muscle fibres
of the wholly empty stomach, whereby its cavity disappears, makes
a part of the sensation which we call hunger.” Vierordt[196] drew
the same inference twenty-five years later (in 1871), and since
then Ewald, Knapp, and Hertz have declared their adherence to this
view. These writers have not brought forward any direct evidence for
their conclusion, though Hertz has cited Boldireff’s observations on
fasting dogs as probably accounting for what he terms “the gastric
constituent of the sensation.”
The Empty Stomach and Intestine Contract
The argument commonly used against the gastric contraction theory
is that the stomach is not energetically active when empty. Thus
Schiff[197] stated, “The movements of the empty stomach are rare
and much less energetic than during digestion.” Luciani[198]
expressed his disbelief by asserting that gastric movements are
much more active during gastric digestion than at other times, and
cease almost entirely when the stomach has discharged its contents.
And Valenti[199] stated (1910), “We know very well that gastric
movements are exaggerated while digestion is proceeding in the
stomach, but when the organ is empty they are more rare and much
less pronounced,” and, therefore, they cannot account for hunger.
Evidence opposed to these suppositions has been in existence
for many years. In 1899 Bettmann[200] called attention to the
contracted condition of the stomach after several days’ fast. In
1902 Wolff[201] reported that after forty-eight hours without food
the stomach of the cat may be so small as to look like a slightly
enlarged duodenum. In a similar circumstance I have noticed the same
extraordinary smallness of the organ, especially in the pyloric
half. The anatomist His[202] also recorded his observation of the
phenomenon. In 1905 Boldireff[203] demonstrated that the whole
gastro-intestinal tract has a periodic activity while not digesting.
Each period of activity lasts from twenty to thirty minutes, and
is characterized in the stomach by rhythmic contractions ten to
twenty in number. These contractions, Boldireff reports, may be
stronger than during digestion, and his published records clearly
support this statement. The intervals of repose between periodic
recurrences of the contractions lasted from one and a half to two
and a half hours. Especially noteworthy is Boldireff’s observation
that if fasting is continued for two or three days, the groups of
contractions appear at gradually longer intervals and last for
gradually shorter periods, and thereupon, as the gastric glands
begin continuous secretion, all movements cease.
Observations Suggesting that Contractions Cause Hunger
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account