Transvaal (South Africa) -- History; Transvaal (South Africa) -- Politics and government
II. REPLY OF DR. KUYPER.
I received the following letter, March 29th:
AMSTERDAM,
_March 28th, 1900._
TO M. YVES GUYOT.
SIR,
Only having received one number of your paper (23,381) I do not
know whether your criticism is finished. As soon as I have it all
before me--with references to the documents cited, if you please,
otherwise it is difficult to follow--I will see whether it calls
for a detailed reply on my part, in which case I might, according
to American precedent, republish my article, inserting, with your
permission, your reply. This was done by the New York _Outlook_,
when it published in the same number, "the Case of the Boers," and
"the Case of the British."
At the same time the copyright of my article belongs to the Editor
of the _Revue des Deux Mondes_, without whose permission I can do
nothing. As I shall be in Paris before long I will ask him for it,
should your polemic attack seem to me to require a reply.
With regard to your proposal to leave the risks of a fresh
publication to you, while sharing the profits, although I
appreciate the delicacy of such a suggestion, I could not accept
it.
KUYPER.
The following remarks on his letter were published by me in _Le Siecle_,
March 30th.
"With regard to the first point, I regret that, at the time of
writing, Dr. Kuyper should only have received one number of _Le
Siecle_; each of my replies having been sent to him under
registered cover on the day of publication. It is unfortunate for
me that Dr. Kuyper's Article should have appeared in the _Revue des
Deux Mondes_, for that brings me again into contact with M.
Brunetiere, and it is well-known that M. Brunetiere who, last year
for fifteen days burdened _Le Siecle_ with his prose, does not wish
this discussion to be presented to the reader in its entirety. I am
greatly afraid of his desiring the same isolation for Dr. Kuyper's
article.
"As far as I am concerned, having began my reply to Dr. Kuyper I
shall continue it. If it is not M. Brunetiere's wish that our
articles should be published together he will thereby acknowledge
anew the force of my replies. Were they not documented and
convincing, he would not fear their proximity."
III. ANOTHER LETTER.
On April 6th I sent the following letter to Dr. Kuyper (registered).
_April 6th, 1900._
SIR,
In a few days I shall have finished my replies to your article;
they will then be published in pamphlet form. I have the honour to
ask you definitely whether you accept my proposal to precede them
with your article in the _Revue des Deux Mondes_.
YVES GUYOT.
In answer to this I received the following letter from Dr. Kuyper
written from the Grand Hotel, Paris:
GRAND HOTEL,
12, BOULEVARD DES CAPUCINES,
_April 12th, 1900._
SIR,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account