A powerful practical joke of a double-barrelled kind was played by a
Fleet Street artist, and got into the papers of the time. There were two
black-and-white artists in the Street of Adventure. One was H. Furniss
with an “i”; the other was H. Furness with an “e.” The one was an
Irishman; the other was a Yorkshireman. The latter was the perpetrator
of the joke. Joseph Biggar, the well-known Parliamentary obstructionist,
was so unfortunate as to have been made the defendant in an action for
breach of promise of marriage. What was still more unfortunate was that
he lost his case, and was cast in heavy damages. Furness (with an “e”)
herein saw an opening. He drew a cheque for the amount of the damages
incurred, and forwarded it to Jo Biggar in a letter glowing with
expressions of sympathy and admiration. Biggar attributed this act of
princely generosity to Furniss (with an “i”), and sent to that gentleman
an acknowledgment of his great indebtedness. Meanwhile the joker had
stopped his cheque at the bank, and Jo Biggar had given the
correspondence—the donor’s letter and his own reply—to the Press. Biggar
was covered with shame, Furniss (with an “i”) was aroused to indignation,
and Furness (with an “e”) had proved himself—as is the nature of
furnaces, however spelt—to be very hot stuff.
But it was among my theatrical friends that I found the most patient,
enterprising, and scientific prosecutors of humour in action. J. L.
Toole was very fond of the practical joke. But he did not carry his
schemes out on the generous scale that seemed the proper proportions to
certain of his colleagues. His jokes were small personal affairs, never
calculated to give pain or annoyance, and invariably described in some
paper or another. “How _do_ these things get into the papers?” Sothern
was a past-master in the fine art of practical joking. Some of his most
notorious successes in that line have been narrated in works of biography
or autobiography by other men. But I was a witness of two of his efforts
in this way which I have never seen described in print. They indicate
the time, thought, and pains, which Sothern was always prepared to spend
over the elaboration of a practical joke in order that it might
eventually be presented complete and perfect. He possessed a true
actor’s faith in efficient rehearsal.
The breakfasts of Sam Rogers, the banker-poet, at the beginning of the
nineteenth century, may have been very interesting reunions; but they
could not have been half as amusing as the breakfasts of Sothern given
during the closing years of that century. No one was invited to these
gatherings who was not either odd or interesting or witty. The
conversation was kept up to the mark by a host who could play on the
faculties of his guests as a musician on the strings of an instrument.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account