The eventual solution of the difficulty will, doubtless, come to us from
the element responsible for most of our modern miracles. An adaptation
of wireless methods with the telephone seems to be indicated. The
newspaper office of the future will be a vast exchange, an enormous
central depot, from which the news of the day will be transmitted to
scattered subscribers. At these central establishments the news of the
world will continually pour in. Skilled hands—the old sub-editorial
hands—will winnow it, prune it, classify it, and, generally speaking,
make it ready for the million receivers of the subscribers. Happily, the
new order will involve little or no abrogation of the functions of the
journalist. The editor, of course, is doomed, for the public will pay
for news, and not for notions. But even under the journalistic order as
we know it the power of the editor has become more and more
circumscribed. He has been going for a long time; soon he will have
gone. But the position of the staff should be enhanced. The journalist,
who must reappear under some other title, will be brought more under the
personal control of the subscriber. Errors in collection or transmission
will, as in other departments, be traced to their source. The members of
a staff will no longer find shelter behind the impenetrable anonymity of
an editor. They will have less kudos, but they will have better pay.
They will have become the servants of a sound commercial undertaking, and
they will have ceased to talk of themselves as “the Fourth Estate of the
Realm.”
The processes of evolution are very gradual, and go unrecorded. How long
will this one take? A century? Half a century? Shall we tie ourselves
to a date, and fix upon the year 1960 as the time of the great
consummation?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account