And it was strange, too—in its way—that, when the debate was set down for
hearing, I, a member of the Pelican Club, should have been deputed by the
editor of an evening paper to attend Convocation, and write a more or
less graphic description of the historic debate. My experience of the
Upper House of Convocation, while assuring me that its members possessed
quite a respectable amount of debating power, also convinced me that
their deliberations were academic merely, and that the Bishops were
terribly out of touch with actualities. The conditions under which the
“House” sat were not conducive to those illusions which the laity should
cherish regarding the episcopacy. Their lordships met in a dining-room
on the first-floor of a house in Dean’s Yard, Westminster. A striped
wall-paper was adorned at gaping intervals with engravings from Millais
and Landseer. The furniture was mid-Victorian. A long telescope-table
filled the middle of the room. Round this board sat the Bishops,
presided over by the Archbishop of Canterbury, who took his place at the
top of the table. Had their lordships not been robed in billowing white,
with lawn sleeves, doctors’ hoods, and decorated with episcopal signets,
the idea conveyed to the mind of the casual observer would have been that
of a group of commercial travellers assembled in the commercial room of a
country hotel waiting for the one o’clock ordinary. In the embrasure of
a window looking out on to Dean’s Yard a table was placed for the
reporters. The general public was, of course, rigorously excluded.
Arrangements were made only for a certain number of reporters—six, I
think, was the limit. And it had been necessary to arrange for the
absence of one of these gentlemen, so that I, who unfortunately have
never mastered shorthand, might be present. From my coign of vantage in
the embrasure I could see some Westminster schoolboys playing in the
enclosure. Their shrilling shouts punctuated the earlier deliberations
of their lordships. Besides ourselves of the Press and the members of
the Upper House of Convocation, the only other person present was Sir
John Hassard, the courteous Registrar. His chief duty seemed to be that
of ushering the gentlemen of the Press in and out of this hopelessly
bourgeois Upper Chamber. And this was a ceremony of frequent occurrence.
When their lordships considered that the trend of the debate made it
desirable that strangers should retire, the Archbishop looked over to us,
smiled benevolently, and observed: “If you please, gentlemen.” It
reminded me of Ponsford’s early morning admonition to customers supping
late at the Albion. We rose. Sir John preceded us to the door, opened
it, and bowed us out. Presently—their lordships having concluded their
private colloquy—he came out to us in the passage, and ushered us in
again.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account