A considerable proportion of my Press work had to do with the theatres.
I was acquainted with most of the actors and managers of my time, and
some of the oddest fish that ever swam into my ken were connected with
the “profession.”
There was, for instance. William Duck—manager, theatre-owner,
impresario. Duck commenced life in some very humble capacity in the West
of England. By a practice of punctuality, civility, a strict attention
to business, and the other virtues which are supposed to furnish forth
the complete British tradesman, he became a music-seller and purveyor of
musical instruments. In this capacity he evolved, by easy stages, into a
booker of theatre seats. And although Duck would not know a good play
from a bad one, he saw in the theatre an easy way to fortune. He felt
his feet by dabbling a little as “sharer” in likely ventures. But he
found himself, and, incidentally, founded his fortune, when, acting
alone, he purchased the country rights of “Our Boys.”
How much Duck netted out of that most diverting comedy I cannot say; but
I know that it was a prodigious sum. When first the money came tumbling
in, the happy man built him a lordly pleasure-house. In his new mansion
there were prominent two works of art: a statue of William Shakespeare
and a life-size portrait of Henry Byron. But, of the two, Duck always
considered the author of “Our Boys” to be the greater genius. He thought
no end of the writer of the play that brought him his first really big
returns. I met him, in deep mourning, a short time after Byron’s death.
“Ah, sir,” he said, shaking his head, “we’ll never see another man like
him—not in _our_ time.”
And Byron took every advantage of his admirer’s infatuation. Anything
that Byron brought him in the shape of a play Duck bought. When Duck
followed his idol to the Elysian Fields, his executors came upon a whole
press full of Byron manuscripts which were little more than “dummies.”
Byron had parted with his birthright for a mess of pottage, and
considered that he was justified in thus getting back a bit of his own.
Becoming interested in productions running at one or two of the West End
houses, Duck was now frequently to be met “in front,” and became known to
members of the Press. He was an exceedingly common-looking man, and one
of his eyes always oozed moisture, which caused him to raise his
handkerchief to his face while he conversed—a habit which acquaintances
at first found a little disconcerting. He was extremely ignorant—or, to
speak by the cards, extremely uneducated—and he never employed an
aspirate except when it was absolutely unnecessary. Which reminds me of
a story.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account