Bolshevism: The Enemy of Political and Industrial DemocracySpargo, John
History
Bolshevism: The Enemy of Political and Industrial Democracy
Spargo, John
Communism -- Soviet Union; Soviet Union -- History -- Revolution, 1917-1921
History proved that we were wrong--we and those who like us, in
1848, awaited the speedy success of the proletariat. It became
perfectly clear _that economic conditions all over the Continent
were by no means as yet sufficiently matured for superseding the
capitalist organization of production_. This was proved by the
economic revolution which commenced on the continent of Europe
after 1848 and developed in France, Austria-Hungary, Poland, and,
recently, also in Russia, and made Germany into an industrial
state of the first rank--all on a capitalist basis, _which shows
that in 1848 the prevailing conditions were still capable of
expansion_. And to-day we have a huge international army of
Socialists.... If this mighty proletarian army has not yet reached
its goal, if it is destined to gain its ends only in a long drawn
out struggle, making headway but slowly, step by step, this only
proves how impossible it was in 1848 to change social conditions
by forcible means ... the time for small minorities to place
themselves at the head of the ignorant masses and resort to force
in order to bring about revolutions, is gone. _A complete change
in the organization of society can be brought about only by the
conscious co-operation of the masses_; they must be alive to the
aim in view; they must know what they want. The history of the
last fifty years has taught us that.[51]
What Engels had in mind when he stressed the fact that history showed that
in 1848 "the prevailing conditions were still capable of expansion" is the
central Marxian doctrine of historical inevitability. It is surely less
than honest to claim the prestige and authority of Marx's teachings upon
the slender basis of a distorted version of his early thought, while
completely ignoring the matured body of his doctrines. It may not matter
much to the world to-day what Marx thought, or how far Lenine follows his
teachings, but it is of importance that the claim set up by Lenine and
Trotzky and many of their followers that they are guided by the principles
of Marxian Socialism is itself demonstrably an evidence of moral or
intellectual obliquity, which makes them very dangerous guides to follow.
It is of importance, too, that the claim they make allures many Socialists
of trusting and uncritical minds to follow them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account