Bolshevism: The Enemy of Political and Industrial DemocracySpargo, John
History
Bolshevism: The Enemy of Political and Industrial Democracy
Spargo, John
Communism -- Soviet Union; Soviet Union -- History -- Revolution, 1917-1921
This subjection, _if the participants in the common work are
ideally conscious and disciplined_, may resemble the mild leading
of an orchestra conductor; but may take the acute form of a
dictatorship--if there is no ideal discipline and consciousness.
But at any rate, _complete submission to a single will is
absolutely necessary for the success of the processes of work
which is organized on the type of large machine industry_. This is
doubly true of the railways. And just this transition from one
political problem to another, which in appearance has no
resemblance to the first, constitutes the peculiarity of the
present period. The Revolution has just broken the oldest, the
strongest, and the heaviest chains to which the masses were
compelled to submit. So it was yesterday. And to-day, the same
Revolution (and indeed in the interest of Socialism) demands the
_absolute submission_ of the masses to the _single will_ of those
who direct the labor process. It is self-evident that it can be
realized only after great upheavals, crises, returns to the old;
only through the greatest strain of the energy of the proletarian
vanguard which is leading the people to the new order....
To the extent to which the principal problem of the Soviet rule
changes from military suppression to administration, suppression
and compulsion will, _as a rule, be manifested in trials, and not
in shooting on the spot_. And in this respect the revolutionary
masses have taken, after November 7, 1918, the right road and have
proved the vitality of the Revolution, when they started to
organize their own workmen's and peasants' tribunals, before any
decrees were issued dismissing the bourgeois-democratic judicial
apparatus. _But our revolutionary and popular tribunals are
excessively and incredibly weak. It is apparent that the popular
view of the courts--which was inherited from the regime of the
landowners and the bourgeoisie--as not their own, has not yet been
completely destroyed_. It is not sufficiently appreciated that the
courts serve to attract all the poor to administration (for
judicial activity is one of the functions of state
administration); that the court is _an organ of the rule of the
proletariat and of the poorest peasantry; that the court is a
means of training in discipline_. There is a lack of appreciation
of the simple and obvious fact that, if the chief misfortunes of
Russia are famine and unemployment, these misfortunes cannot be
overcome by any outbursts of enthusiasm, but only by thorough and
universal organization and discipline, in order to increase the
production of bread for men and fuel for industry, to transport it
in time, and to distribute it in the right way. That therefore
_responsibility_ for the pangs of famine and unemployment falls on
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account