Bolshevism: The Enemy of Political and Industrial DemocracySpargo, John
History
Bolshevism: The Enemy of Political and Industrial Democracy
Spargo, John
Communism -- Soviet Union; Soviet Union -- History -- Revolution, 1917-1921
Absence of control permits every abuse of power; absence of secret
voting permits that into these Soviets at these suspicious
elections some enter who are attracted by the political role of
these institutions; the defeat of inequality in the suffrage
restrains the expression of the will of the peasants, and,
accordingly, these cannot have confidence in this system of
government. The tyranny that presided at these elections was such
that the Bolsheviki themselves pay no attention to the results,
and declare that the Soviets that are opposed to themselves are
bourgeoisie and capitalists. We, representing the peasant workers,
must declare in the name of our constituents: if anything can save
Russia, it can only be the re-establishment of the organs of
local autonomous administration, chosen by equal, direct, and
secret universal suffrage and the resumption, without delay, of
the work of the Constituent Assembly.
The Constituent Assembly alone can express the exact will of the
working-people, for the system of election which governs it
includes every measure of precaution against violence, corruption,
and other abuses, and assures the election of deputies chosen by
the majority; now, in the country, the majority is composed of the
working class.
Millions of peasants delegated us to defend the Constituante, but
this was dissolved as soon as it began to work for the good of the
people. The work of the Constituante was interrupted at the time
that it was discussing the law concerning land, when a new
agricultural regime was being elaborated for the country. For this
reason, and for this alone, the Constituante adopted only the
first articles of this law, articles which established the
definite transfer of all the land to the hands of the workers,
without any ransom. The other articles of this law, which
concerned the order of the apportionment of lots, its forms, its
methods of possession, etc., could not be adopted, although they
were completely elaborated in the commission and nothing remained
but to sanction them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account