Bolshevism: The Enemy of Political and Industrial DemocracySpargo, John
History
Bolshevism: The Enemy of Political and Industrial Democracy
Spargo, John
Communism -- Soviet Union; Soviet Union -- History -- Revolution, 1917-1921
The tactics which can be defined by the motto, "All or nothing,"
are the tactics of anarchy, fully unworthy of the conscious
representatives of the proletariat and peasantry. The General
Staff of the German Army would greet with pleasure the news that
we had adopted such tactics. _Believe us that this Staff is ready
to help all those who would like to preach it in our country_.
They want trouble in Russia, they want strikes in England, they
want everything that would facilitate the achievement of their
conquering schemes.
But you will not make them rejoice. You will not forget the words
of our great fabulist: "What the enemy advises is surely bad." You
must insist that all your representatives take the most active
part in all organizations created now, under the pressure of
public opinion, for the struggle with the foe. Your
representatives must, if possible, take part not only in the work
of the special technical organizations, such as the War-Industrial
Committees which have been created for the needs of the army, but
also in all other organizations of social and political character.
The situation is such that we cannot come to freedom in any other
way than by the war of national defense.
That the foregoing Manifesto expressed the position of the vast majority of
Russian Socialists there can be no doubt whatever. Between this position
and that of the Porazhentsi with their doctrine that Russia's defeat by
Germany was desirable, there was a middle ground, which was taken by a not
inconsiderable number of Socialists, including such able leaders as Paul
Axelrod. Those who took up this intermediate position were both
anti-Czarists and anti-German-imperialists. They were pro-Ally in the large
sense, and desired to see the Allies win over the Central Empires, if not a
"crushing" victory, a very definite and conclusive one. But they regarded
the alliance of Czarism with the Allies as an unnatural marriage. They
believed that autocratic Russia's natural alliance was with autocratic
Germany and Austria. Their hatred of Czarism led them to wish for its
defeat, even by Germany, provided the victory were not so great as to
permit Germany to extend her domain over Russia or any large part of it.
Their position became embodied in the phrase, "Victory by the Allies on the
west and Russia's defeat on the east." This was, of course, utterly
unpractical theorizing and bore no relation to reality.
V
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account