Bonnie Scotland and what we owe herGriffis, William Elliot
History
Bonnie Scotland and what we owe her
Griffis, William Elliot
Scotland; Scotland -- Description and travel
After the death of the Bruce, Stirling Castle was captured, in
succession, by Edward Balliol and for King David. When the House of
Stuart had evolved from a family of Norman barons, emigrants from
Shropshire to improve their fortunes, and, acting as stewards in the
new land, had reached royalty, Stirling Castle became the king’s
dwelling-place. For centuries afterward, it was their favorite
residence and the place of coronation of the Scottish kings. Here James
II and James V were born and here James VI of Scotland and I of England
was baptized.
It was James III who added so largely to its architecture and built
the Parliament House. It is in an inventory of the effects of this
slaughtered king that the first mention of the thistle as the national
emblem of Scotland occurs. Later this device appears on the coins of
the realm, but not until James VI is found the motto, “Nemo me impune
lacessit.”
As we entered through the gateway and walked up through the
battlemented Inner Way, we almost imagined we heard the din of clashing
swords echoing the past. The palace, built by James V, in the form of
a quadrangle, is in the southwestern part and is profusely decorated.
Yet when ornamentation and structure are compared, two opposing systems
appear to be at work. One seems to swear at the other. The critic had
better not look too closely when near, if he wishes to enjoy harmony,
for in this case, most decidedly, does distance lend enchantment to
the view. Seen from afar, the ornaments appear rich and graceful, but
when close at hand they become grotesque. Corbels and brackets are
especially suggestive of agonizing exertion and the general effect
is that of a nightmare. At a distance, these melt into harmonious
proportions, but they lose their charm when we are close at hand. Here
are hideous mixtures of human and brute life. Many of the leering faces
are simply idiotic and the contortions of the bodies clustered together
are horrible. As has been well said, “the wildest and least becoming of
the classic legends are here embodied, without any attempts to realize
beauty of form.”
What terrible paradox, or love of the ugly, must have dominated the
taste of the sculptor, in the same age that reared some of the glorious
abbeys of Scotland! The King’s Room, which had an oaken ceiling, with
richly decorated beams, and in each partition a magnificently carved
head,--the fame of which had gone all over Europe,--was abolished in
1777, when the roof, from its weight, threatened to fall in.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account