Books and their makers during the Middle Ages : $b A study of the conditions of the production and distribution of literature from the fall of the Roman Empire to the close of the seventeenth century, Vol. IPutnam, George Haven
History
Books and their makers during the Middle Ages : $b A study of the conditions of the production and distribution of literature from the fall of the Roman Empire to the close of the seventeenth century, Vol. I
Putnam, George Haven
Books -- History -- 400-1450; Copyright; Freedom of the press -- History -- To 1500; Manuscripts; Printers
discovery from a certain Cornelius when the latter was over eighty
years of age. Cornelius testified that he had himself been a binder
in the establishment of Koster, and the Dutch historian, Meerman, has
discovered in the records of the church of Haarlem a memorandum dated
1474, which is evidence that there was at that date a binder in the
town called Cornelius.[426]
In claiming for Holland the prestige of inventing the several
distinctive processes connected with the printing of books, Humphreys
sums up as follows: It is beyond dispute that the Dutch were the first
to produce block-books, and thus were virtually the first printers
of books. It is also a matter of record that it was the printers of
Holland who first devised the art of stereotyping, a process which
was applied by John Miller of Amsterdam towards the close of the
seventeenth century. There is, therefore, apart from the details
above specified and from the evidence of tradition, a strong natural
presumption in favour of the development in Holland of the intervening
step of substituting movable types for carved pages of letters.
Humphreys points out that there are other references to the production
in the Netherlands of books from movable metal types, before the date
at which Gutenberg’s first volume was completed in Mayence. In a
record of accounts of Jean Robert, Abbé of Cambrai, the manuscript of
which has been preserved in the archives of the city of Lille, appears
the entry: “Item, for a printed (_getté en molle_) _Doctrinal_ that
I sent for to Bruges by Macquart, who is a writer at Valenciennes,
in the month of January, 1445, for Jacquet, twenty sous, Tournois.
Little Alexander had one the same, that the church paid for.” It is
stated later in the record that one of these books proved to be so
“full of faults” that it had to be replaced by a written copy.[427]
The purport of the term _getté en molle_ (which might possibly have
been written _jetté_ or _guetté_) was first elucidated by M. Besuard,
who pointed out that it evidently stood for “cast in a mould,” the
reference being to the metallic types, which were so cast. In the
letters of naturalisation accorded, in 1474, to the first printers with
movable types established in Paris, the term used is _escritoire en
molle_, or writing by means of moulds or moulded letters. Humphreys is
inclined to give credit to the theory, which is presented by many of
the advocates of Koster, that the first suggestion of the new art was
brought to Gutenberg in Strasburg by a workman who had been employed
by Koster in Haarlem, but he admits that this theory is supported by
practically nothing that can be called evidence, and depends for its
authority simply upon the sequence of events, and upon the surmises
and probabilities suggested by Junius. It remains the case that after
the death of Koster, which occurred either in 1440 or in 1439, the
production of books from type came to an end in Holland, and that for
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account