Books and their makers during the Middle Ages : $b A study of the conditions of the production and distribution of literature from the fall of the Roman Empire to the close of the seventeenth century, Vol. IPutnam, George Haven
History
Books and their makers during the Middle Ages : $b A study of the conditions of the production and distribution of literature from the fall of the Roman Empire to the close of the seventeenth century, Vol. I
Putnam, George Haven
Books -- History -- 400-1450; Copyright; Freedom of the press -- History -- To 1500; Manuscripts; Printers
Dietrich or Theodoric, the first Abbot of St. Evroul (1050-1057), who
was himself a skilled scribe (_Ipse manu propria scribendo volumina
plura_), and who desired to incite his monks to earnest work as
writers, related to them the story of a worldly and sinful Brother,
who, notwithstanding his frivolities, was a zealous scribe, and who
had, in industrious moments, written out an enormous folio volume
containing religious instruction. When he died, the devil claimed his
soul. The angels, however, brought before the throne of judgment the
great book, and for each letter therein written, pardon was given for
one sin, and behold, when the count was completed, there was one letter
over; and, says Dietrich naïvely, it was a very big book. Thereupon,
judgment was given that the soul of the monk should be permitted
again to enter his body, in order that he might go through a period of
penance on earth.[94]
In the monastery of Wedinghausen, near Arnsberg in Westphalia, there
was a skilled and zealous scribe named Richard, an Englishman, who
spent many years in adding to the library of the institution. Twenty
years after his death, when the rest of his body had crumbled into
dust, the right hand, with which this holy work had been accomplished,
was found intact, and has since been preserved under the altar as a
holy relic.[95]
There has been more or less discussion as to whether in the
_scriptoria_, it was the practice for monks to write at dictation.
Knittel[96] takes the ground that the larger portion of the work was
done so slowly, and probably with such a different degree of rapidity
on the part of the different scribes, that it would have been as
impracticable for it to have been prepared under dictation as it would
be to do copper engraving under dictation. Ebert,[97] confirming
Knittel’s conclusions, points out that when works were needed in haste,
it was probably arranged to divide up the sheets to be copied among
a number of scribes. He finds evidence of this arrangement of the
work in a number of manuscripts, the different portions of which, put
together under one cover, are evidently the work of different hands.
Wattenbach specifies manuscripts in which not only are the different
pages in different script, but the divisions have been written with
varying arrangements of space; in some cases the space, which had
been left for an interpolated chapter having evidently been wrongly
measured, so that the script of such interpolated chapter had to be
crowded together instead of having the same spacing as that of the
body of the work. Sickel presents examples of the letters of Alcuin
which are evidently the work of a number of scribes. Each began his
work with a new letter, and where, at the end of the divisions, leaves
remained free, other letters were later written in. In the later Middle
Ages, however, there is evidence of writing at dictation, and this
practice began to obtain more generally as the results of the work of
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account