Books and their makers during the Middle Ages : $b A study of the conditions of the production and distribution of literature from the fall of the Roman Empire to the close of the seventeenth century, Vol. IPutnam, George Haven
History
Books and their makers during the Middle Ages : $b A study of the conditions of the production and distribution of literature from the fall of the Roman Empire to the close of the seventeenth century, Vol. I
Putnam, George Haven
Books -- History -- 400-1450; Copyright; Freedom of the press -- History -- To 1500; Manuscripts; Printers
Richard of Wendover, who succeeded Walter as historiographer, compiled,
between the years 1230 and 1236, the _Flores Historiarum_, one of the
most important of the earlier chronicles of England. Hardy points out
that it could have been possible to complete so great a work within
the term of six years, only on the assumption that Richard found
available much material collected by Walter, and it is also probable
that other compilations were utilised by Richard for the work bearing
his name. It is to be borne in mind that the monastic chronicles were
but seldom the production of a single hand, as was the case with the
chronicles of Malmesbury and of Beda. The greater number of such
chronicles grew up from period to period, fresh material being added in
succeeding generations, while in every monastic house in which there
were transcribers, fresh local information was interpolated until the
tributary streams had grown more important than the original current.
In this manner, the monastic annals were at one time a transcript, at
another time an abridgment, and at another an original work. “With the
chronicler, plagiarism was no crime and no degradation. He epitomised
or curtailed or adapted the words of his predecessors in the same
path with or without alteration (and usually without acknowledgment),
whichever best suited his purpose or that of his monastery. He did not
work for himself but at the command of others, and thus it was that a
monastery chronicle grew, like a monastery house, at different times,
and by the labour of different hands.”
Of the heads that planned such chronicles or of the hands that executed
them, or of the exact proportion contributed by the several writers, no
satisfactory record has been preserved. The individual is lost in the
community.
In the earlier divisions of Wendover’s chronicle, covering the
centuries from 231 down to about 1000, Wendover certainly relied,
says Hardy, upon some previous compilation. About the year 1014, that
narrative, down to the death of Stephen, showed a marked change in
style, giving evidence that after this period some other authority had
been adopted, while there was also a larger introduction of legendary
matter. From the accession of Henry II., in 1235, when the _Flores
Historiarum_ ends, Wendover may be said to assume the character of an
original author. On the death of Richard, the work of historiographer
was taken up by Matthew Paris. His _Lives of the Two Offas_ and his
famous _Chronicles_ were produced between the years 1236 and 1259.
In certain of the more literary of the English monasteries, the divine
offices were moderated in order to allow time for study, and, under the
regulations of some foundations, “lettered” persons were entitled to
special exemption from the performance of certain daily services, and
from church duty.[145]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account