Books and their makers during the Middle Ages : $b A study of the conditions of the production and distribution of literature from the fall of the Roman empire to the close of the seventeenth century, Vol. IIPutnam, George Haven
History
Books and their makers during the Middle Ages : $b A study of the conditions of the production and distribution of literature from the fall of the Roman empire to the close of the seventeenth century, Vol. II
Putnam, George Haven
Books -- History -- 400-1450; Copyright; Freedom of the press -- History -- To 1500; Manuscripts; Printers
During the larger portion of time in which the presses of the Elzevirs
were active, the publishers had the advantage of carrying on their work
under comparatively slight restrictions in the matter of government
censorship, while to censorship on the part of the Church there are
but few references. It is probable that during the seventeenth century
the Press of the Dutch Republic was more untrammelled than that of any
State in Europe. It is true that there is record of various edicts
and regulations on the part of the States-General prohibiting the
printing of libellous material, or of works directed against princes
or governments which were allied with the Republic. There is also an
occasional edict against the circulation of publications classed as
“irreligious” or “obscene.” With the latter class of publications the
Elzevirs took no part either as printers or as booksellers. It did
occasionally happen, however, that they interested themselves in the
production and in the circulation of publications, the purpose or
influence of which might evoke criticisms or complaints from friendly
governments or from individual statesmen. For such publications they
found it wise to make use of some _nom de presse_ or to issue the same
without imprint of name or place. Such publications can be identified
as coming from the Elzevirs either by means of books of account or
through the evidence of their very distinctive fonts of type.
Among the books for the anonymous circulation of which the House was
responsible, were the _Defensio Regia_ of Saumaise, the _Defensio
Populi Anglicani_ of Milton, and the _Mare Clausum_ of Selden. The
interest of the Elzevirs in circulating the last named treatise (which
was an argument to justify certain pretensions of England) is somewhat
to be wondered at, because, only shortly before, they had published
with their imprint the famous argument of Grotius, _Mare Liberum_, in
which was upheld the Dutch contention in behalf of the freedom of the
seas.
On a number of the unavowed publications of this kind, the Elzevirs
placed the imprint _Lugduni_ (Lyons), in place of _Lugduni Batavorum_
(Leyden). This was done particularly in the case of the writings of the
French Jansenists, who would not wish to emphasise the fact that these
were printed in such an heretical headquarters as Leyden. One of the
bogus names employed quite frequently for these unavowed publications
was that of Jouxte, and another was Jean Sambix. The imprint of Nic
Schouten, Köln, was also utilised, together with a number of mythical
or manufactured names connected with actual places.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account