Books and their makers during the Middle Ages : $b A study of the conditions of the production and distribution of literature from the fall of the Roman empire to the close of the seventeenth century, Vol. IIPutnam, George Haven
History
Books and their makers during the Middle Ages : $b A study of the conditions of the production and distribution of literature from the fall of the Roman empire to the close of the seventeenth century, Vol. II
Putnam, George Haven
Books -- History -- 400-1450; Copyright; Freedom of the press -- History -- To 1500; Manuscripts; Printers
As in the case of the privileges, the censorship was, for something
more than half a century, that is, from 1469 to 1528, carried on
without the aid of any general law, and was based simply upon a
practice or series of precedents evolved from the individual action
taken by the Government in each instance as it arose. The granting
of privileges had, as we have seen, been the duty sometimes of the
College, sometimes of the Senate. The responsibility concerning
censorship rested naturally with the Council of Ten, which in its
capacity as a standing committee of safety, assumed a general charge of
the morals of the community.
The censorship of the Press in Venice, as elsewhere, was concerned with
three aspects of literature: the religious, the moral (which included
the political), and the purely literary. Morality was considered from
both the public and the private or personal point of view, the former
including as its chief consideration the safety of the State.
The operation of the censorship was marked by the presence of an
_imprimatur_ or record of authorisations. As has already been noted,
applications for a privilege were occasionally accompanied by a
certificate or _testamur_ from certain competent authorities, who had
examined the work in question and who were willing to certify as to its
soundness and importance.
The earliest example of an ecclesiastical _testamur_ printed in a book
published in Venice, appears at the beginning of the _Nosce Te_, issued
by Jenson in 1480. The _Nosce Te_ was a book of devotion, written
by a Carthusian monk, Giovanni di Dio, and the _testamur_ in this
case might, therefore, be interpreted simply as an approval by his
ecclesiastical superiors of the work done by him as an ecclesiastic.
There is no record that the _Nosce Te_ ever secured a privilege from
the Venetian Government, and it seems certain that at the date in
question no such _testamur_ was required under the regulations of the
secular government.
No further instance of a clerical _testamur_ occurs before 1505, when
Jacomo di Penzi, of Lecco, a printer, in applying to the Council for a
privilege for certain books he desired to print, states that he has
an _imprimatur_ from the Council of Ten, and a _testamur_ from the
Patriarch as to the merit of one of the works, the _Tre famosissime
Questioni_, by Zane, Archbishop of Spalato. In the year 1508, we have
the first example of an ecclesiastical _testamur_ being required by the
Council of Ten, as a condition for their own _imprimatur_. The work was
the _Universalis animæ traditionis liber quintus_ of Gregoriis, and the
ecclesiastical censor appointed to examine the work from a theological
point of view, reported that he found in it nothing opposed to Catholic
verity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account