Boscobel; or, the royal oak: A tale of the year 1651Ainsworth, William Harrison
History
Boscobel; or, the royal oak: A tale of the year 1651
Ainsworth, William Harrison
Great Britain -- History -- Commonwealth and Protectorate, 1649-1660 -- Fiction
The plan was executed with remarkable quickness and precision. No
sooner were the men formed than a general charge was made on Perry
Wood, each division taking its appointed course. Such was the
impetuosity of the Cavaliers who formed the central body led by the
king, that they drove back Cromwell's body-guard who rode down the hill
to meet them, and rushing on with irresistible fury broke through the
pickets, forced the intrenchments, and putting the artillerymen to the
sword, actually obtained possession of the enemy's largest guns.
For a brief space Charles, who had led this wonderful charge--the most
brilliant feat performed at the fight of Worcester--seemed master
of the position. He was on the very spot just occupied by Cromwell
himself, and had taken his guns. The valiant Cavaliers who attended
their sovereign raised a shout of triumph, and struck the cannon with
their swords.
With the king were Colonel Legge, Colonel Lane, Captain Giffard,
Colonel Blague, Marmaduke Darcy, Wogan, and Careless. They had ridden
close behind him, and had shared every danger he incurred. Colonel
Legge, indeed, had saved the king's life. It was a singular sight
to see the royal party on the top of the hill in the midst of the
Parliamentarian forces. But their position seemed scarcely tenable,
though Hamilton and Derby were pressing on, on either side, to their
aid.
Nevertheless, Charles exulted in his brief triumph, and his exultation
was shared by his companions. The hitherto invincible Ironclads had
retreated before him, and were still in confusion and disorder, while
both Hamilton and Derby, animated by the king's success, were driving
all before them. Moreover, a most important result had been obtained by
the capture of the guns. Fort Royal, which had suffered considerably
from the ceaseless cannonade of the battery, was now left unmolested.
At this critical juncture, when his fate hung in the balance, and when
the Scottish horse might have helped him to victory, Charles looked
anxiously down to the spot where Lesley was posted. He was still there
with his troops. But they remained motionless, although their leader
must have been aware of the king's success, and must have felt how
important aid would be at that moment.
"Does he move?--is he coming?" cried Charles.
"No, sire," rejoined Legge, straining his eyes in the direction of the
Scottish cavalry. "He does not stir. Curses on him for a traitor."
"Oh, that Montrose were alive and in his place!" ejaculated Charles,
bitterly. "He would not have served me thus!"
"No, sire," observed Careless. "Montrose would have secured you the
victory."
It may be that the battle of Worcester was lost by Charles, owing to
Lesley's inaction or treachery. If the king's extraordinary success
could have been at once followed up, victory might have ensued. Who
shall say?
CHAPTER XXIX.
HOW THE BATTLE OF WORCESTER WAS LOST BY THE KING.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account